Skip to main content

Security report for awesomeqa.xyz

Pluno · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pluno is a newly established technology startup founded in 2024, specializing in AI-powered customer support agents tailored to specific business needs. Their platform focuses on delivering faster customer issue resolution and higher satisfaction by fine-tuning AI models to domain expertise beyond generic bots. The company targets businesses seeking advanced AI customer support solutions and positions itself as a niche provider in this emerging market. Technically, the website is built using Framer CMS and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is professionally designed with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are published, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the risk profile is moderate with no signs of blocking or malicious activity, but privacy compliance and security best practices need enhancement to build trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching awesomeqa.xyz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pluno operates in the AI technology sector, offering custom AI customer support agents as a SaaS business model. Their competitive advantage lies in fine-tuning AI to specific business domains, aiming to improve customer satisfaction and operational efficiency. The company appears to be in early growth stages with a small size and no parent or subsidiary companies identified. Their market positioning is focused on businesses requiring specialized AI support solutions rather than generic chatbots. The website links to social media platforms such as Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram, indicating efforts to build brand presence and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include subscription or licensing fees for AI support services. The lack of detailed contact or compliance information suggests the company is still developing its corporate infrastructure and compliance frameworks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces protection against certain attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of published privacy, cookie, or security policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and incident readiness. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels and company contact emails.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pluno
Description
Pluno builds AI support agents fine-tuned to your business, delivering faster resolutions, higher CSAT & domain expertise beyond generic bots.
Key services
Custom AI customer support agents, Fine-tuning AI to business domain expertise, Improved customer satisfaction and faster resolution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Framer (CMS/website builder), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a new AI customer support business.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page or metadata.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the visible content.
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. Domain is newly registered with privacy protection, typical for startups.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
  8. Social media presence includes Twitter (x.com), LinkedIn, Instagram links.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No business certifications or compliance frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts, improving performance. The domain is registered via NameCheap with privacy protection, typical for startups. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. No CMS other than Framer is detected. Hosting appears standard with registrar DNS servers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a startup but should be enhanced for scalability, security, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with awesomeqa.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review awesomeqa.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.