Skip to main content

Security report for awesome-ind.com

Awesome Industries · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Awesome Industries is a Poland-based digital agency specializing in designing, building, deploying, and managing enterprise solutions with a focus on cloud platforms and microservices architecture. The company has a strong market position supported by long-term partnerships with notable clients such as HP and a portfolio of diverse projects ranging from retail solutions to manufacturing platforms. Their business model centers on agile delivery and close collaboration with client teams to provide tailored enterprise software solutions. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks like Svelte and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. Hosting is managed via home.pl DNS services, consistent with their Poland location. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no advanced security headers or vulnerability disclosures are present. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching awesome-ind.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets enterprise clients needing digital transformation and cloud-based microservices solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in deep technical expertise, agile methodologies, and strong partnerships with industry leaders like HP. Revenue streams likely derive from software development contracts, consulting, and platform deployment services. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple technology and manufacturing companies, enhancing their market credibility. Growth indicators include ongoing projects since 2013 and award-winning solutions. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding security and compliance documentation to strengthen client trust and meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate with basic protections such as domain transfer lock and cookie consent. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and security.txt files indicates gaps in security best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but SSL configuration details are unknown. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are not publicly available, which may impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Enhancing security policies, publishing incident response contacts, and implementing DNSSEC would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider appointing and publicly listing a Data Protection Officer or security contact to demonstrate commitment to data protection and incident response.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Awesome Industries
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Awesome Industries
Description
We are a digital agency that focuses on designing, building, deploying, and managing enterprise solutions including cloud Platforms based on a microservices architecture.
Key services
frontend, ui/ux design, consulting, cloud backend, infrastructure, architecture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Go lang, JavaScript, Svelte, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Svelte
Platforms
Cloud platforms, Microservices architecture
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.
  2. Strong emphasis on enterprise digital solutions and cloud platforms.
  3. Multiple references to partnerships with reputable companies like HP.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. No phone number found; only email and physical address provided.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. Use of modern JavaScript framework Svelte and microservices architecture.
  10. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Svelte for frontend development and Go for backend microservices, indicating a contemporary and scalable infrastructure. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. Hosting appears to be managed via home.pl DNS services, consistent with the company's Poland location. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to DNS attacks and web-based vulnerabilities. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with awesome-ind.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review awesome-ind.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.