Skip to main content

Security report for avo.app

Avo · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avo is a technology company specializing in upstream event data quality and schema management solutions for data and product teams. Their SaaS platform offers collaborative schema change management, data observability, and analytics implementation tools designed to improve data accuracy and governance. The website demonstrates a strong market position with enterprise customers and positive trust signals such as testimonials and case studies. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, Mixpanel, and Segment, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is robust with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though a dedicated security policy and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible digital presence for the company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avo.app

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avo targets data and product teams in medium to large enterprises seeking to improve event data quality and governance. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on schema management, observability, and implementation tooling. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms like HubSpot and integrates with major analytics tools. Growth indicators include active webinar registrations, detailed event tracking, and a strong social media presence. The company maintains a consistent brand and offers comprehensive resources such as documentation and blogs, positioning itself as a thought leader in data quality management.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. Tracking and marketing scripts are used extensively but appear managed and standard for SaaS marketing sites. There is no explicit security policy or incident response information, which could be improved for transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the content or WHOIS data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture supports business trust but could benefit from enhanced disclosure of security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security controls and practices.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Consider implementing and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency by naming a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Avo
Description
Avo helps data and product teams guarantee event data quality upstream, so they can build great user experiences. It offers schema change management with source control, governance, ownership, and tools for data observability, tracking plan management, and analytics implementation.
Key services
Schema management, Event instrumentation tools, Data observability and monitoring, Integrations with analytics and CDP tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, FullStory, Segment, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, jQuery, Webflow CMS
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form handling with event tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, FullStory, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mixpanel, FullStory, Segment
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Google Optimize
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong use of modern analytics and marketing technologies.
  3. Multiple forms for demo requests, signups, and webinar registrations with detailed event tracking.
  4. Clear privacy, cookie, and terms policies linked in footer.
  5. Active social media presence with official company accounts.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  7. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, performant tech stack with Webflow CMS and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Mixpanel, FullStory, Segment, and HubSpot. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN ensuring fast load times. The use of extensive event tracking and form analytics indicates a high level of digital maturity. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avo.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avo.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.