Skip to main content

Security report for avlbaltic.eu

AVL Baltic · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AVL Baltic is a Lithuania-based company specializing in professional audio, video, and lighting equipment and solutions for business and professional markets. Their offerings include a wide range of AV products such as audio streaming devices, professional speakers, video projectors, and lighting systems tailored for commercial, educational, and entertainment environments. The company targets AV integrators, businesses, and event organizers seeking high-quality AV solutions. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with a modern tech stack and responsive design, facilitating a good user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is privacy protected as per EURid policy, which is typical for .eu domains, but this reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with clear contact information and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avlbaltic.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AVL Baltic operates in the niche professional AV equipment sector, focusing on B2B sales and integration services. Their market position is that of a regional specialist providing tailored AV solutions. The business model revolves around product sales and system integration, targeting professional users and businesses requiring advanced AV setups. The company maintains partnerships with related AV and technology providers, enhancing its service offerings. The website content and structure support a professional image, though the lack of detailed company registration or founding information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The presence of privacy and cookie policies indicates awareness of regulatory compliance. Growth potential may be linked to expanding digital signage and architectural lighting markets.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, mitigating spam and enhancing security. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit security or incident response policies reduces transparency regarding security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate, suitable for a small professional business but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AVL Baltic
Description
AVL Baltic offers professional audio, video, and lighting equipment and solutions targeting business and professional users. They provide products such as audio streaming devices, professional speakers, video projectors, lighting systems, and AV solutions for various environments including commercial, educational, and entertainment sectors.
Key services
Audio equipment sales, Video equipment sales, Lighting solutions, AV system integration, Consulting and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, Select2, Modernizr, Plupload
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and product categorization.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed including phone numbers, email, and contact form with reCAPTCHA.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policy.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design indicates moderate technical maturity.
  8. No obvious security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected in HTML content.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  10. No visible advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, Select2, and Modernizr, indicating a moderately modern front-end stack. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, with no common CMS identified. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider and backend infrastructure details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional business website with room for modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avlbaltic.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avlbaltic.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.