Skip to main content

Security report for avg.lv

Rīgas Āgenskalna Valsts ģimnāzija · Education · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Āgenskalna Valsts ģimnāzija is a Latvian public secondary educational institution providing comprehensive educational programs, extracurricular activities, and student support services. The website serves as an information hub for students, parents, and staff, offering news updates, schedules, and contact information. The site is built on WordPress with a modern block editor, ensuring good content management and user experience. Technically, the site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, but lacks some security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but could be improved by adding security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, serving its educational mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avg.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates in the education sector, targeting local students and community members in Riga, Latvia. It maintains a consistent brand presence and provides a wide range of educational and extracurricular services. The business model is that of a public school, funded and operated likely by local government or educational authorities. The website supports bilingual navigation (Latvian and English), indicating inclusivity and outreach. There is no evidence of commercial activities or partnerships beyond educational services. The site’s content and structure suggest a medium-sized institution with active community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, which is essential. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve security posture.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and themes for vulnerabilities and keep them updated.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by providing clear security contact information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Āgenskalna Valsts ģimnāzija
Description
Rīgas Āgenskalna Valsts ģimnāzija is an educational institution (high school) located in Riga, Latvia, providing secondary education and related services including extracurricular activities, career support, and library resources.
Key services
Secondary education programs, Extracurricular activities, Career support, Library services, Student support and administration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
WordPress block editor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational institution site in Latvian language.
  2. Content is rich with news, events, and educational resources.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response info.
  5. No external advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; domain appears privacy protected or restricted.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and modern WordPress block editor technologies.
  8. Contact info includes official email and phone number with clear context.
  9. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  10. Site navigation is clear and includes multilingual support (Latvian and English).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the block editor and modern JavaScript modules. It uses minified CSS and JS assets for performance optimization. The site is responsive and accessible, with skip links and ARIA attributes for screen readers. No heavy external analytics or advertising scripts were detected, which benefits privacy and performance. The site loads a slider plugin for image carousels and uses standard web fonts. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in caching and asset delivery. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for an educational website but could be enhanced with better security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avg.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avg.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.