Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention avestar.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for avestar.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Латвийская астрологическая ассоциация "АВЕСТА" · Education · Latvia
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.
The Latvian Astrological Association "AVESTA" operates as a specialized educational and consultation center focused on Avestan astrology. Founded in 2004, it offers professional astrology training both online and offline, alongside personalized astrological consultations and forecasts. The organization positions itself as a professional and quality-driven entity within the Latvian market, targeting individuals interested in astrology education and personal development. The website content is rich, professionally presented, and available primarily in Russian and Latvian languages. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snowplow Analytics, and service workers, hosted on a CDN-backed platform. While the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism present but no detailed GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with no signs of malicious activity or adult content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy analysis, but the website's content and structure support a positive trust assessment. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving privacy compliance transparency.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention avestar.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for avestar.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with avestar.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avestar.lv.