Skip to main content

Security report for avenga.com

Avenga · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Avenga is a well-established global technology partner specializing in custom software development, data and AI, AdTech and MarTech, and managed services. The company targets businesses across multiple sectors including automotive, manufacturing, retail, banking, media, telecommunications, and life sciences. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with rich content including case studies and insights, supporting its market position as a trusted technology partner. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and protected by Sucuri Cloudproxy WAF, with extensive use of modern marketing and analytics tools. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, with no valid certificate and no HTTPS enabled, which significantly impacts the security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility and user experience but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching avenga.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention avenga.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
116
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
114
Weak passwords
1%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for avenga.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Avenga operates in the technology services sector with a broad industry focus, leveraging over 20 years of experience and a large skilled workforce. The company emphasizes client retention and proven results, indicating a stable and mature business model. Its digital presence includes multiple social media channels and a dedicated career site, suggesting active engagement with clients and talent acquisition. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to business growth. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response information suggests an area for improvement in transparency and trust-building. The company’s global footprint is implied but not explicitly detailed in the content.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is moderate to poor due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS, despite the presence of security headers and a WAF. This exposes users to risks such as data interception and undermines trust. The site uses a reputable WAF provider (Sucuri), which provides some protection against attacks. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. No explicit security or incident response policies are found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption further weakens the SSL/TLS security. Overall, the site needs immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhanced transparency on security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites to improve encryption security.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  5. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  6. Maintain and regularly update security headers and Content Security Policy for enhanced protection.
  7. Ensure all forms and data collection points use secure transmission and validate inputs.
  8. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization for broader user inclusivity.
  9. Continue to maintain comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  10. Increase transparency by providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers on the site.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a custom theme and uses Sucuri Cloudproxy as a WAF. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, and Piwik PRO. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques, providing a good user experience on mobile devices. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically deficient with no valid certificate and no TLS protocols enabled, which is a major technical risk. Performance metrics are not available, but the site uses caching (FastCGI cache HIT) and CDN-like services. The DNS setup uses AWS Route53 name servers and multiple MX records for email. SPF records are valid and comprehensive, indicating good email security practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent SSL/TLS remediation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with avenga.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review avenga.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.