Skip to main content

Security report for autentica.lv

Autentica SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autentica SIA is a Latvian IT company specializing in business and IT strategy alignment, software development, implementation, and support services. The company serves clients primarily in the energy and government sectors, offering a broad range of IT solutions including public sector software, integration, mobile and web development, and automation. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions, client logos, and employee testimonials, indicating a stable market position and trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Maps API. SEO is enhanced by the Yoast SEO plugin, and the site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that supports GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though the lack of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy assessment. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility to strengthen compliance and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching autentica.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Autentica operates as an essential IT service provider focused on consulting, software development, and IT support, targeting public sector and energy clients. The company leverages certifications and client partnerships to maintain competitive advantages. Its business model centers on delivering tailored IT solutions and strategic alignment services. The presence of multiple certifications and client logos indicates a mature partnership ecosystem and a commitment to quality. Growth indicators include active journal updates and employee testimonials reflecting a positive work culture. The company’s digital presence is consistent and professional, supporting its market positioning in Latvia.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, which could impact compliance with standards like ISO 27001 or NIST. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics is managed with user consent, mitigating privacy risks. Overall, the security culture appears positive but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and compliance.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Autentica SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autentica SIA
Description
IT uzņēmums • IT Company providing business and IT strategy alignment, software development, implementation, support and maintenance services.
Key services
IT Strategy Development, IT Process Development, Testing Management, Quality Assurance, Public Sector Solutions, Integration & Large Scale Data Processing, Mobile & Web Development, Custom Development, ERP, CRM & Billing Implementation, Geographic Information Systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear business focus
  2. Strong presence of client logos and certifications indicating trust
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with opt-in for analytics
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  8. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Maps integration
  9. Moderate use of analytics and tracking with user consent
  10. Good SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin and meta tags
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Maps API, indicating a standard modern web technology stack. SEO is supported by the Yoast SEO plugin, and the site includes structured data in JSON-LD format for improved search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though optimization opportunities exist. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Technical risks include the lack of security headers and potential technical debt from older jQuery versions. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with autentica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review autentica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.