Skip to main content

Security report for austinbatcave.org

Austin Bat Cave · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Austin Bat Cave is a well-established non-profit organization based in the US, focused on empowering youth and adults through creative writing programs. Their offerings include writing workshops, school programs, summer camps, and an online writing lab, positioning them as a community-centric educational entity in Austin, Texas. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional presentation, targeting a broad audience interested in literacy and storytelling. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, Yoast SEO for optimization, and integrations with Google Analytics and Mailchimp for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics in place. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and some best practices observed, but there are opportunities for improvement such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy is present but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented despite tracking usage. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, indicating legitimacy and transparency. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching austinbatcave.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention austinbatcave.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for austinbatcave.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Austin Bat Cave operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on literacy and creative writing. Their business model revolves around community engagement, volunteer tutoring, and program delivery for youth and adults. The organization leverages digital tools for outreach and fundraising, including social media and email marketing. The domain age and WHOIS data support a stable market presence since 2007. The website's integration with WooCommerce suggests some revenue generation through sales, likely of anthologies or related merchandise. Partnerships or sponsorships are hinted but not explicitly detailed. The organization maintains a clear local focus with a strong community orientation, which is a competitive advantage in their niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for enhancement. The site uses reputable plugins and analytics tools with opt-out mechanisms, but lacks a cookie consent banner, which is a compliance gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could affect readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit educational site but should be improved to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Austin Bat Cave
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Austin Bat Cave
Description
Austin Bat Cave is a creative community offering writing programs that empower students to find their voices and tell their stories.
Key services
Writing Workshops, School Programs, Mobile Program (Bat Mobile), Summer Camps, Online Writing Lab, Anthology publication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Mailchimp, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Jetpack, Paid Member Subscriptions, Woo Donations, Atomic Blocks
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit educational platform
  2. Content is rich and relevant to creative writing education
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  4. Social media and newsletter integration present
  5. No cookie consent banner despite use of tracking
  6. No visible security policy or incident response info
  7. DNSSEC not enabled, minor security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS using the Genesis Framework and multiple plugins for SEO, e-commerce, analytics, and content presentation. The tech stack includes jQuery, Slick Carousel, WooCommerce, Mailchimp integration, and Google Analytics via MonsterInsights. Hosting and DNS are managed through Squarespace Domains and Google Domains respectively. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses modern web standards and responsive design. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of DNSSEC. Overall, the infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with austinbatcave.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review austinbatcave.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.