Austin Bat Cave is a well-established non-profit organization based in the US, focused on empowering youth and adults through creative writing programs. Their offerings include writing workshops, school programs, summer camps, and an online writing lab, positioning them as a community-centric educational entity in Austin, Texas. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional presentation, targeting a broad audience interested in literacy and storytelling. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, Yoast SEO for optimization, and integrations with Google Analytics and Mailchimp for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics in place. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and some best practices observed, but there are opportunities for improvement such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy is present but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented despite tracking usage. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website content, indicating legitimacy and transparency. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
68
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention austinbatcave.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for austinbatcave.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Austin Bat Cave operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on literacy and creative writing. Their business model revolves around community engagement, volunteer tutoring, and program delivery for youth and adults. The organization leverages digital tools for outreach and fundraising, including social media and email marketing. The domain age and WHOIS data support a stable market presence since 2007. The website's integration with WooCommerce suggests some revenue generation through sales, likely of anthologies or related merchandise. Partnerships or sponsorships are hinted but not explicitly detailed. The organization maintains a clear local focus with a strong community orientation, which is a competitive advantage in their niche.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for enhancement. The site uses reputable plugins and analytics tools with opt-out mechanisms, but lacks a cookie consent banner, which is a compliance gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could affect readiness and transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit educational site but should be improved to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Austin Bat Cave
Description
Austin Bat Cave is a creative community offering writing programs that empower students to find their voices and tell their stories.
Key services
Writing Workshops, School Programs, Mobile Program (Bat Mobile), Summer Camps, Online Writing Lab, Anthology publication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Mailchimp, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Jetpack, Paid Member Subscriptions, Woo Donations, Atomic Blocks
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced with SSL
Google Analytics opt-out mechanism
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a WordPress-based non-profit educational platform
Content is rich and relevant to creative writing education
No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
Social media and newsletter integration present
No cookie consent banner despite use of tracking
No visible security policy or incident response info
DNSSEC not enabled, minor security improvement opportunity
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a WordPress CMS using the Genesis Framework and multiple plugins for SEO, e-commerce, analytics, and content presentation. The tech stack includes jQuery, Slick Carousel, WooCommerce, Mailchimp integration, and Google Analytics via MonsterInsights. Hosting and DNS are managed through Squarespace Domains and Google Domains respectively. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses modern web standards and responsive design. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of DNSSEC. Overall, the infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with austinbatcave.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review austinbatcave.org.