Skip to main content

Security report for aufstandinperson.de

Deutsches Bauernkriegsmuseum Böblingen · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Der Aufstand in Person is a digital platform and interactive exhibition hosted by the Deutsches Bauernkriegsmuseum Böblingen, commemorating 500 years of the Bauernkrieg (Peasants' War). The website offers rich historical content, including biographies of key figures, interactive maps, and detailed archival materials, targeting history enthusiasts, museum visitors, and educational institutions. The platform leverages modern web technologies such as Next.js and Sanity CMS, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned within the cultural education sector in Germany.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aufstandinperson.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aufstandinperson.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aufstandinperson.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a niche educational and cultural market, focusing on regional historical events. Its business model is non-profit, centered on museum education and public engagement. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its detailed archival content and interactive features, supported by partnerships with regional archives and cultural institutions. The target audience includes academics, students, and local communities interested in the Bauernkrieg. The site demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals through museum affiliation and archival references. Growth potential exists in expanding digital outreach and educational collaborations.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS and asynchronous script loading. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies represent compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The use of privacy-friendly analytics (Plausible) is a positive aspect. Enhancing security headers and publishing clear privacy documentation would strengthen the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to maintain a secure and up-to-date technology stack.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deutsches Bauernkriegsmuseum Böblingen
Description
Digitale Plattform und interaktive Karte zu 500 Jahre Bauernkrieg im Bauernkriegsmuseum Böblingen. Die Website präsentiert eine Sonderausstellung mit historischen Informationen, interaktiven Karten und biografischen Details zu Protagonisten des Bauernkriegs.
Key services
Digital platform for historical exhibition, Interactive map of the Bauernkrieg, Biographical and historical content, Museum event information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Sanity CMS, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Async loading of scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a digital museum platform focused on the 500-year anniversary of the Bauernkrieg.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and historically detailed with multimedia elements.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No forms detected for user input or contact.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and good performance optimizations.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  8. No advertising networks detected; uses privacy-friendly analytics (Plausible).
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; suitable for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data is minimal, limiting full trust assessment but no red flags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Sanity CMS for content management, enabling dynamic and interactive content delivery. Performance is optimized with preloading of critical assets and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Hosting details are not explicit but likely cloud-based. No technical debt or legacy technology issues were identified. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aufstandinperson.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aufstandinperson.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.