Skip to main content

Security report for auditmypc.com

Audit My PC - Free Internet Security Audit · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Audit My PC is a niche website offering free internet security audit tools and webmaster utilities such as firewall tests, digital footprint analysis, internet speed tests, anti-spam tools, sitemap generators, and website monitoring. The site targets webmasters and home users interested in improving their online security and website performance. The business model revolves around providing free tools supported by advertising revenue, primarily through Google Adsense. The website has been active since at least 2010, indicating a long-standing presence in the internet security niche, although domain registration details are not publicly available, which raises some concerns about legitimacy. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Genesis Framework and employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Google Adsense for analytics and monetization. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization and navigation are good, providing a positive user experience. However, some accessibility features are basic, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy and terms of service are present, there is no cookie consent mechanism, which may be a compliance gap under GDPR. Contact information is not explicitly provided, limiting user support and incident response capabilities. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and provides valuable free tools for its audience. The main risk factors are the absence of WHOIS data, which reduces trust and raises questions about domain registration status, and the lack of some security best practices and privacy compliance features. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching auditmypc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Audit My PC operates in the technology sector, focusing on internet security and webmaster tools. Its market positioning is that of a free tool provider catering to webmasters and home users seeking to audit their internet security and website performance. The business model relies on advertising revenue, primarily through Google Adsense, with no evident paid services. The website's longevity since 2010 suggests stable operations, but the absence of WHOIS data may indicate domain registration issues or privacy protection. The site does not list partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating a small independent operation. The content and tools offered provide competitive advantages in niche security testing and webmaster utilities. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of business transparency. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with external links mostly to common web services and ad networks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy and terms of service exist, but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, which may be a GDPR compliance gap. Incident response readiness is low due to lack of explicit security contact information or vulnerability disclosure policies. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Adsense introduces moderate tracking and data collection risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small informational website but could be improved with enhanced headers, privacy controls, and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries to improve trust and incident response capabilities.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize security risks and ensure compliance with privacy standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Audit My PC - Free Internet Security Audit
Description
Firewall Test and web tools to check your security and privacy
Key services
Firewall Test, Digital Footprint Scan, Internet Speed Test, Anti Spam Tool, Sitemap Generator, Website Monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Adsense, All in One SEO, Genesis Framework, WordPress
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides free internet security and webmaster tools.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on homepage.
  4. Privacy and Terms pages exist but cookie consent is missing.
  5. Uses modern SEO and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Genesis Framework, leveraging jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Adsense for analytics and advertising. The site uses All in One SEO plugin for metadata and structured data management. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, and navigation is clear and user-friendly. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and modern but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with auditmypc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review auditmypc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.