Skip to main content

Security report for audiovizualnitvorba.cz

Ústav filmové, televizní a rozhlasové tvorby (ÚFTaRT), Slezská univerzita v Opavě · Education · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Ústav filmové, televizní a rozhlasové tvorby (ÚFTaRT), an academic institute affiliated with the Silesian University in Opava, Czech Republic. It focuses on providing quality education in audiovisual creation, supporting students, and engaging in cultural and media projects including film festivals, exhibitions, and conferences. The site serves students, academics, and the cultural community with a professional and content-rich platform. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, offering good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the university affiliation and professional presentation support legitimacy. Overall, the site is a credible academic and cultural resource with room for improvement in privacy and security compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audiovizualnitvorba.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute operates within the education and media sectors, leveraging partnerships with university subdomains and cultural projects. Its business model is academic and project-based, focusing on audiovisual education and cultural event organization. The target audience includes students, educators, and cultural professionals. The website demonstrates consistent branding and a clear market position as a regional academic leader in audiovisual arts. Growth indicators include active social media channels and multiple ongoing projects. The partnership ecosystem is strong with related university domains and cultural festivals. Strategic observations suggest enhancing privacy compliance and security policies to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced, preventing data interception. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No forms or sensitive data exposure were detected, reducing attack surface. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting readiness for security events. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and incident management to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response contact.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ústav filmové, televizní a rozhlasové tvorby (ÚFTaRT), Slezská univerzita v Opavě
Description
Provides quality education in audiovisual creation, supports students' success, and actively participates in the cultural life of the region.
Key services
Audiovisual education, Film, television, and radio production, Cultural event organization, Media projects and exhibitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.2.8, jQuery 3.6.4, Google Fonts (Roboto Mono), FontAwesome, Cornerstone plugin, Otter Blocks plugin, ThemeIsle Neve theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed academic and cultural site affiliated with Silesian University.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage for data collection.
  9. Content is in Czech language and focused on audiovisual education and cultural projects.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with up-to-date core version 6.2.8, supported by plugins like Cornerstone and Otter Blocks, and the Neve theme from ThemeIsle. It employs jQuery 3.6.4 and FontAwesome for UI elements, and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced security headers and analytics tracking, indicating a focus on content delivery over marketing or data collection. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security and privacy infrastructure are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audiovizualnitvorba.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audiovizualnitvorba.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.