Skip to main content

Security report for audienceorb.com

AudienceORB · Technology · Poland

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AudienceORB is a Poland-based technology company specializing in data management and customer data platforms, offering advanced audience segmentation, predictive analytics, and marketing automation solutions. Their business model focuses on providing B2B data-driven marketing tools and analytics services to marketers and firms aiming to optimize programmatic campaigns and business intelligence. The company is a subsidiary of LastLevel ltd., with a professional web presence and partnerships with several technology firms. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks like Bootstrap, integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security, and uses Cloudflare DNS. While the site is well-designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie policy documentation. Security posture is moderate with good SSL usage and spam protection but could be improved with additional headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR, though some enhancements in security and privacy transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      SPF record too permissive

      The "+all" mechanism allows anyone to send email

      What to do: Change to "~all" (softfail) or "-all" (hardfail)

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching audienceorb.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
58
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain · found on this site

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AudienceORB occupies a niche in the data management and analytics sector, leveraging big data, machine learning, and predictive analytics to serve marketers and e-commerce clients. Their competitive advantage lies in deep audience segmentation and integration capabilities with demand-side platforms. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, data services, and consulting. The company targets digital marketers and firms requiring precise audience insights. Growth indicators include partnerships with multiple technology firms and a clear focus on innovation in data-driven marketing. The parent company, LastLevel ltd., supports the brand, enhancing credibility. The partnership ecosystem is diverse, indicating collaborative market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which may hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. GDPR compliance is evident through consent mechanisms and a privacy policy, but cookie policy transparency is lacking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology firm but requires improvements to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated cookie policy page detailing cookie usage and management to improve privacy transparency and compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and security contact email to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform usability testing to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LastLevel ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AudienceORB
Description
Experts in analyzing anonymous user profiles from global markets, providing data management, predictive analytics, machine learning, and business intelligence solutions to marketers and firms for personalized online campaigns and programmatic targeting.
Key services
Audience segmentation, Analytics & ML, Data dashboards, E-commerce analytics, Marketing automation, Data quality improvement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Widcher GDPR widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Consent checkbox for data processing on contact form
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Widcher GDPR widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear business focus on data management and analytics services.
  3. Contact form includes GDPR consent and uses reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  4. No explicit cookie policy page found, but GDPR widget is implemented.
  5. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
  7. Use of multiple third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager and GDPR widget.
  8. Partner logos indicate active business relationships.
  9. No phone number explicitly provided on the website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. Hosting and DNS are managed via OVH sas and Cloudflare respectively, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. However, no CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Technical debt appears low but the lack of advanced security headers and cookie policy documentation suggests areas for modernization and compliance enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with audienceorb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review audienceorb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.