Skip to main content

Security report for atriumcph.com

Atrium · Education · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atrium is a Denmark-based educational organization specializing in training and networking services for life science and pharmaceutical professionals. The company offers a broad range of courses and professional networks designed to support lifelong learning from entry-level to expert stages within the pharmaceutical industry. Their market position is that of a specialized provider catering to the Nordic life science sector, with a focus on professional development and industry-relevant competencies. Technically, the website is built on the C1 CMS Foundation platform and integrates modern web technologies including jQuery, YouTube API, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, providing a smooth user experience with rich multimedia content and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and contact information support its legitimacy. Overall, Atrium's website reflects a professional and trustworthy educational service with moderate technical maturity and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, verifying domain registration details, and improving incident response visibility to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atriumcph.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atrium operates in the education sector, focusing on life science and pharmaceutical professional development. Their business model revolves around providing specialized courses, educational programs, and networking opportunities tailored to industry professionals. The company targets a niche market of life science professionals in Denmark and the Nordic region, leveraging partnerships with industry experts and maintaining an active presence on LinkedIn and Facebook. Revenue streams likely include course fees, event hosting, and venue services (Life Science House). The organization demonstrates growth potential through continuous content updates and engagement with professional communities. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining compliance with GDPR and enhancing digital trust through transparent domain registration and security practices.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. The use of third-party marketing and analytics tools is transparent and consent-based. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, along with no visible security or incident response policies, indicates gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure channel reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhancements to align with industry standards and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Verify and publicly disclose domain registration details to enhance domain legitimacy and user trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and marketing tools to minimize security risks.
  5. Consider establishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atrium
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atrium
Description
Atrium offers valuable learning experiences that help professionals advance in the pharmaceutical and life science industry. They provide courses and networks covering all pharmaceutical industry areas, supporting lifelong learning from basic to expert levels.
Key services
Courses, Educational programmes, Professional networks, Events and venue services (Life Science House)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
YouTube API, jQuery 3.1.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieInformation consent management, Sleeknote marketing tool
Frameworks
C1 CMS Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Google Marketing Platform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Sleeknote
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and descriptions.
  3. Multiple social media integrations and active LinkedIn presence.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  8. Use of modern CMS and third-party marketing and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the C1 CMS Foundation platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrating with external services like YouTube, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Sleeknote for marketing and analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and multimedia content. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and improve domain registration transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium5 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atriumcph.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atriumcph.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.