Skip to main content

Security report for atrego.de

atrego GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

atrego GmbH is a small, established German technology company specializing in professional web design, app development, software programming, and related digital services. Founded in 2001 and based in Halle (Saale), Germany, the company targets businesses seeking comprehensive online presence solutions including web hosting, SEO, and social media marketing. The website reflects a consistent and professional brand image with clear service offerings and customer engagement channels. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome Pro, and Google Analytics with a CMS platform named Contentserver24. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with structured data enhancing search visibility. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atrego.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atrego.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for atrego.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a niche in energy-related content services as well. Its business model is service-oriented, providing tailored digital solutions to clients. The market position is stable with a long history since 2001 and a focus on quality and customer satisfaction, evidenced by high customer ratings. The company maintains active social media profiles and uses Google verification to enhance trust. Revenue streams likely include web design projects, app development contracts, hosting services, and digital marketing. The partnership with Contentserver24 indicates a strategic ecosystem for content delivery. Growth indicators include a regularly updated blog and diversified product offerings. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager is transparent with opt-out options. However, the absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy pages are found, which limits transparency on handling security events. The forms include anti-bot measures like reCAPTCHA. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
atrego GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
atrego GmbH
Description
Web-Design aus Halle an der Saale. Zeitgemäße Internetseiten, sicheres Webhosting, Programmierung, Shopsysteme und App-Entwicklung. Entwicklung von Webanwendungen und Apps, schnelle, effiziente und zielorientierte Lösungen.
Key services
Webdesign, App development, Software programming, Print design, Social media, SEO, Webhosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, FontAwesome Pro 6, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Contentserver24 CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap 5
Platforms
Contentserver24 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Google site verification meta tags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and business-focused on web and app development services.
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager with opt-out mechanism.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and maintainable technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and FontAwesome Pro for icons. It uses Contentserver24 CMS, which provides modular content management and cookie consent integration. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and layout. Some technical debt is indicated by reliance on jQuery and older Google Analytics UA tracking alongside GA4. Hosting details are limited but DNS uses routing.net nameservers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs effectively with room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atrego.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atrego.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.