Skip to main content

Security report for atomicon.io

Atomic Consulting · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atomic Consulting is a Lithuania-based IT consulting and recruitment firm specializing in sourcing senior IT professionals and providing dedicated teams primarily for banking, fintech, and big data sectors. The company leverages a network of seasoned software experts to deliver tailored IT staffing solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the business profile, supporting legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atomicon.io

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche IT recruitment and consulting provider focusing on senior-level professionals in specialized technologies like PHP, React, Java, Python, and QA Engineering. Their client base includes blue chip companies in banking and fintech, indicating a strong market position in high-value sectors. The business model revolves around outsourcing, dedicated teams, and recruitment services, targeting enterprises needing rapid and reliable IT staffing. The presence of LinkedIn profiles for key executives and client logos supports credibility. Growth potential is indicated by recent client acquisitions and a focused service portfolio. However, the lack of publicly available privacy and security policies may impact enterprise trust and compliance requirements.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests incomplete GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for consulting firms but geographic mismatch between registrant country and business location is noted. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, formal privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atomic Consulting
Description
Atomic Consulting manages a vast network of seasoned software experts and provides IT consulting services including senior specialist outsourcing, dedicated teams, and IT recruiting. They specialize in serving blue chip companies in banking, fintech, and big data industries.
Key services
Senior specialists outsourcing, Dedicated teams, IT Recruiting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4, FontAwesome 5, WordPress 5.8.10, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on the website.
  2. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  3. Contact form shortcode present but no active form rendered.
  4. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook confirmed.
  5. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected but domain age and status are consistent with a legitimate business.
  8. Website content is professional and targeted at IT recruitment and consulting.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and plugin scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.10 with Bootstrap 4 and jQuery 3.6.0, providing a modern and responsive front-end framework. FontAwesome 5 is used for icons. The site uses Contact Form 7 plugin, though no active contact form is rendered on the homepage. DNS is managed via serveriai.lt name servers, and the domain registrar is 1API GmbH with privacy protection enabled. Performance is moderate with standard CDN usage for fonts and scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts beyond WordPress defaults, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atomicon.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atomicon.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.