Skip to main content

Security report for atlist.com

Atlist Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atlist Inc. operates a SaaS platform focused on enabling users to create custom maps easily, leveraging Google Maps technology. The company targets developers, designers, and businesses requiring tailored map solutions such as store locators and data visualizations. The website demonstrates a strong market position within the niche of customizable map creation tools, supported by a professional design and positive user testimonials. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and MailerLite. The platform is mobile-optimized and performs well with fast loading times. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though some improvements are recommended in security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by the professional presentation and consistent branding. Overall, the website is safe, business-focused, and reliable for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atlist.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atlist.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,141
Employees
0
Customers
1,141
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atlist.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atlist's business model is subscription-based SaaS with free and paid tiers, focusing on ease of use and customization for map creation. The company leverages partnerships with Google Maps Platform and integrates with popular CMS platforms like Webflow, Squarespace, and WordPress. The presence of subdomains for user login and map styling tools indicates a growing ecosystem. The target market includes small to medium businesses and individual professionals needing map solutions without coding. The company maintains a lean operation with a small size profile and no public parent or subsidiary companies. Growth indicators include over 260,000 maps created and millions of markers plotted monthly. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance trust via improved WHOIS transparency and expanded security disclosures.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating good baseline security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations given the use of tracking technologies.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and security researchers.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring accurate and complete domain registration information is publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlist Inc.
Description
Atlist is a simple but powerful Google Maps maker. Share or embed maps anywhere. Free to use.
Key services
Custom map creation, Marker plotting, Map embedding, Google Sheets sync, Store locator maps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps Platform, Google Fonts (Inter), MailerLite (email marketing), Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Webflow CMS
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked in footer.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts and asynchronous JavaScript loading for analytics and marketing tools. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's CDN, providing fast and reliable content delivery. The site is mobile-responsive with good accessibility features and SEO optimization. Use of third-party services like Google Analytics, Plausible, and MailerLite indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Performance is optimized with deferred script loading and minimal blocking resources. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement privacy consent mechanisms to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atlist.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atlist.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.