Skip to main content

Security report for atlassian.net

Atlassian · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atlassian is a leading global technology company specializing in software development and collaboration tools designed for teams of all sizes, from startups to large enterprises. Their product portfolio includes Jira Software, Jira Service Management, Confluence, Bitbucket, Trello, and innovative AI-powered tools like Loom and Rovo. The company positions itself as a provider of a connected cloud platform that underpins modern work systems, emphasizing flexibility, collaboration, and productivity. Atlassian's market position is strong, supported by a comprehensive suite of products and a large, diverse customer base worldwide. Technically, Atlassian's website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging modern web technologies such as JavaScript frameworks, Contentful CMS, and OneTrust for consent management. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. Security is robust, with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and integration of bot protection mechanisms like Google reCAPTCHA. The company maintains compliance with major security frameworks including ISO 27001, SOC 2, and FedRAMP, indicating a strong commitment to data protection and regulatory adherence. The security posture is solid, with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed through clear policies, consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. Business credibility is high, supported by transparent contact channels, certifications, and a professional online presence. The WHOIS data is unavailable likely due to privacy protections, which is justified for a large enterprise brand. Overall, Atlassian's digital presence reflects a trustworthy, secure, and professionally managed organization. Strategically, the company should continue to monitor and update third-party components to mitigate emerging security risks, maintain transparency on data retention, and enhance incident response readiness. These measures will sustain their leadership position and trustworthiness in the competitive technology market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atlassian.net

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atlassian operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS products for software development, IT service management, and team collaboration. Their competitive advantages include a broad product ecosystem, strong integration capabilities, and a cloud platform foundation. Revenue streams derive from subscription-based software licenses and enterprise services. Target customers range from small teams to large enterprises across various industries. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation, AI integration, and expansion of cloud services. The partnership ecosystem includes a robust marketplace and consulting partners. Operationally, Atlassian emphasizes security, compliance, and customer support, reinforcing its market presence and customer trust.

Security posture

Atlassian exhibits a mature security posture with comprehensive controls and certifications. The website enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and integrates bot mitigation tools. Privacy policies and consent management align with GDPR requirements. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes are publicly documented, with dedicated contact channels. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The company demonstrates readiness for compliance with evolving regulations such as NIS2. Security culture is evident through transparency and continuous improvement. Overall, Atlassian maintains a low risk profile with strong security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance transparency on data retention and processing practices for users.
  3. Maintain and test incident response plans to ensure rapid mitigation.
  4. Promote security awareness and training across all organizational levels.
  5. Invest in long-term security strategy focusing on emerging threats and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlassian
Description
Software development and collaboration tools for teams, from startup to enterprise. Try Jira Software, Jira Service Management, JWM, and Confluence.
Key services
Jira Software, Jira Service Management, Confluence, Bitbucket, Trello, Loom, Atlassian Cloud Platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, OneTrust Consent Management, Google reCAPTCHA, Contentful CMS
Frameworks
React (likely, based on modern JS usage), OneTrust CMP
Platforms
Atlassian Cloud Platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Consent management via OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security and compliance certifications

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on software products for teams and enterprises
  3. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies present
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable but consistent with privacy protection for a major brand
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, jQuery, and Contentful CMS, supported by Atlassian's own cloud platform. Performance is optimized with preloading fonts and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. Use of OneTrust for consent management and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection indicates adherence to privacy and security best practices. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible deprecated or vulnerable components. Opportunities exist to further modernize frameworks and enhance analytics transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100 −1Low23 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atlassian.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atlassian.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.