Skip to main content

Security report for atlassian.com

Atlassian · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atlassian is a leading enterprise technology company specializing in collaboration software for software development, IT, and business teams. Their flagship products include Jira, Confluence, and Trello, which facilitate team organization, communication, and project management. The company holds a strong market position as a trusted provider of SaaS collaboration tools with a global enterprise customer base. Technically, the website demonstrates modern infrastructure using React and JavaScript, with excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is robust, featuring HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to recognized frameworks such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence aligned with enterprise standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of atlassian.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atlassian.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention atlassian.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
772,709
Employees
45
Customers
772,339
Third parties
325
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2026-06-15 · 378 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for atlassian.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –id.atlassian.com2026-06-15
  • –id.atlassian.com2026-06-14
  • –id.atlassian.com2026-06-14
  • –events.atlassian.com2026-06-13
  • –id.atlassian.com2026-06-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atlassian operates in the technology sector with an essential entity type and enterprise size. Their business model is SaaS, targeting software, IT, and business teams worldwide. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem and maintains certifications that enhance trust and compliance. Revenue streams are primarily subscription-based from their collaboration software products. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting their market leadership. Strategic partnerships, such as with orangelogic.com for asset delivery, indicate a well-managed digital ecosystem.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Atlassian's website is high, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The presence of multiple security headers, enforced HTTPS, and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA demonstrate adherence to best practices. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, indicating readiness and transparency. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is evident through privacy policies and data protection officer contact information. No critical security issues were detected, and the overall security score is strong.

Recommendations

  1. Continue regular audits and updates of third-party libraries to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance transparency by publishing security incident reports and timelines.
  3. Expand user education resources on security best practices and privacy.
  4. Maintain and update certifications to reflect evolving compliance requirements.
  5. Invest in continuous monitoring and penetration testing to proactively identify risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Atlassian Corporation Plc
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlassian
Description
Atlassian's team collaboration software like Jira, Confluence and Trello help teams organize, discuss, and complete shared work.
Key services
Jira, Confluence, Trello
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • CAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Clear security and incident response policies

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Clear contact and incident response information available.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, but website trustworthiness remains high.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern tech stack including React and JavaScript, with integration of Google reCAPTCHA for security. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are implemented to a good standard, supporting diverse user needs. SEO is well managed with appropriate meta tags and structured data. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but content delivery networks and partner domains are used for asset management. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and secure enterprise-grade web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100 −5Low21 findingsView report
  2. 87/100 +3Low19 findingsView report
  3. 84/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atlassian.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atlassian.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.