Skip to main content

Security report for atlas.design

Atlas · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atlas is a technology startup founded in 2022 specializing in generative 3D AI technology that enables rapid creation of detailed 3D assets and virtual worlds. The company targets creators in gaming, architecture, and AR/VR sectors, offering a subscription-based platform with advanced AI tools and integrations with major 3D engines. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality and strong industry endorsements, positioning Atlas as an innovative player in the 3D AI space. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Nuxt.js and integrates video streaming services, though performance is moderate and accessibility is basic. Security posture is average with no visible security headers and lack of DNSSEC, and privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate new tech business. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching atlas.design

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atlas operates in the technology sector focusing on AI-driven 3D content creation. Its competitive advantage lies in its advanced text-to-3D AI capabilities and end-to-end workflow tools. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting digital creators and game developers. The company has garnered strong testimonials from notable industry players, indicating good market positioning and partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active marketing via Typeform subscriptions. The partnership with Antinomy Labs for website development suggests a collaborative approach to digital presence. Revenue streams likely derive from subscriptions and enterprise licensing. The company currently lacks visible direct contact info and formal privacy policies, which may impact customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

Atlas demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status but lacks DNSSEC. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details were provided, but the presence of external HTTPS links suggests HTTPS usage. The website lacks visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to ensure no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlas
Description
Atlas builds cutting-edge generative 3D AI technology to enable the creation of assets & virtual worlds in a fraction of the time it takes using traditional methods. It offers a suite of AI tools for generating highly detailed and diverse 3D models from reference images and text, targeting creators in gaming, architecture, AR/VR, and virtual world building.
Key services
AI-generated 3D model creation, End-to-end 3D concepting to runtime generation workflow, Custom AI models based on style references, Integration with major gaming and 3D engines
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, JavaScript, Vimeo video embeds, Mux video streaming, Typekit fonts
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses clientTransferProhibited status
  • No DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Typeform (for subscription forms)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Terms and conditions page is present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  5. Strong industry endorsements and testimonials present
  6. Modern tech stack with Nuxt.js and video streaming integrations
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, enhancing SEO and performance. It uses third-party services such as Typekit for fonts, Vimeo and Mux for video streaming, and DatoCMS for content management. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but minimal descriptions. The lack of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Hosting provider details are not explicit, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model but requires enhancements in security and privacy to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with atlas.design. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review atlas.design.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.