Skip to main content

Security report for at-rack.co.uk

AT-Rack · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AT-Rack Limited is a UK-based specialist in mobile data destruction solutions, focusing on secure on-site hard drive degaussing and destruction services. Founded in 2020, the company targets enterprises across sectors such as data centres, healthcare, government, and financial institutions. Their flagship product, the Mobile Destruction System (MDS), enables organizations to securely erase data onsite, ensuring compliance with data privacy regulations including GDPR. The company positions itself as a trusted provider with a strong emphasis on security, compliance, and customer assurance, supported by multiple client testimonials and a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Mesmerize Pro theme, integrated with modern analytics tools like Google Analytics and Matomo, and marketing tools such as Zoho SalesIQ. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with secure HTTPS implementation and CAPTCHA-protected contact forms enhancing security. While explicit security headers are not fully detailed, the overall security posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Security-wise, AT-Rack demonstrates good practices including encrypted communications, secure form handling, and compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The domain registration is consistent with the company's founding date and business claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Overall, AT-Rack presents a credible, professional, and secure digital footprint suitable for its target market. Strategic enhancements in security policy publication and accessibility could further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching at-rack.co.uk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AT-Rack operates in a niche market of secure data destruction, leveraging mobile on-site technology to differentiate from traditional off-site destruction services. Their business model is B2B, serving high-security sectors requiring compliance with stringent data protection laws. Revenue streams likely include product sales (MDS), service contracts for data destruction, and auditing certifications. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with clients such as Convergint and Servero, indicating strong industry relationships. Growth indicators include recent product launches, active blog/news updates, and participation in industry awards and exhibitions. The company emphasizes compliance and security as competitive advantages, targeting enterprises with critical data management needs.

Security posture

AT-Rack exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, CAPTCHA-protected forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations, including cookie and privacy policies. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or incident response framework represent gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The company should consider publishing a security policy and incident response contacts to enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized documentation and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AT-Rack
Description
At-Rack is a mobile data destruction solutions specialist providing on-site hard drive degaussing and destruction.
Key services
Mobile data destruction system (MDS), Secure data shredding, Degaussing, Physical destruction, Data auditing and compliance certification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Zoho SalesIQ chat, WPForms, jQuery
Frameworks
Mesmerize Pro WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Cloudflare Turnstile) on contact forms
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure form handling with WPForms and CAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Zoho SalesIQ
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Clear focus on secure data destruction services for enterprises
  3. Multiple customer testimonials enhance trust
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  5. Contact form secured with CAPTCHA
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
  7. Privacy and cookie policies present and accessible
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Mesmerize Pro theme, integrating multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Zoho SalesIQ chat, and WPForms for contact management. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin usage and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the site includes accessibility considerations such as skip links and ARIA attributes, though these could be improved. The technical stack is current but would benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized privacy and security documentation to reduce technical debt and improve compliance posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with at-rack.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review at-rack.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.