Skip to main content

Security report for astrumq.com

astrumQ · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AstrumQ is a Czech technology company specializing in the development of mobile applications and web systems, with a strong focus on WordPress-based websites and e-shops. The company has over 10 years of experience and offers tailored digital solutions including internal systems, UX/UI design, SEO, and ongoing support. Their market position is that of a specialized service provider targeting businesses seeking custom digital transformation and web presence enhancement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, hosted on SiteGround, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, and MailerLite. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good design and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching astrumq.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
58
Average
52
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention astrumq.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
14%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for astrumq.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AstrumQ operates in the technology sector, providing custom software development and design services primarily for Czech businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in their decade-long experience, specialist team, and personalized project approach. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and ongoing support services. The target customers are businesses needing web and mobile solutions, internal system automation, and UX/UI improvements. The company maintains a professional online presence with case studies and client logos, indicating a stable partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active marketing integrations. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy policies and security measures to strengthen client trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags preventing unauthorized transfers and updates. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas of vulnerability. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which may increase the attack surface if not properly managed. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security contact channels. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology service provider but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, header implementation, and documented privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@astrumq.com).
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
astrumQ
Description
AstrumQ is a technology company specializing in creating mobile applications and web systems. They offer services including WordPress website and e-shop creation, internal systems development, UX/UI design, and digital process automation. They emphasize custom solutions tailored to client needs, quality content and SEO, and ongoing support and maintenance.
Key services
Mobile application development, Web system development, WordPress website and e-shop creation, Internal systems and process automation, UX/UI design and audits, SEO and content creation, Consulting and ongoing support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, MailerLite, Premium Addons for Elementor, SiteGround hosting
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Google Ads, Hotjar
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting Czech businesses.
  3. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.
  4. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, and MailerLite.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage or main navigation.
  6. Cookie consent banner is present and active via CookieYes.
  7. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  8. Security headers are not explicitly detected; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection.
  10. Website branding and design are consistent and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, supported by a range of plugins including Premium Addons and MailerLite for marketing automation. Hosting is provided by SiteGround, a reputable provider. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics and tracking, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Hotjar, indicating a mature marketing and analytics setup. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization in place. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as skip-to-content links. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with astrumq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review astrumq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.