Skip to main content

Security report for assignmenthelpcompany.com

Assignment Help Company · Education · Australia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Assignment Help Company is an online academic assistance provider specializing in assignment help, essay writing, dissertation support, and related educational services targeting university students globally, with a focus on Australia and other English-speaking countries. The website demonstrates a professional and user-friendly design with clear navigation and multiple service offerings. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and captcha protection on forms, but lacks advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trust. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and credible in content but requires improvements in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching assignmenthelpcompany.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leading provider of online assignment help with a decade of experience and a strong customer base reflected by high ratings. Its business model revolves around providing customized academic writing services to students worldwide, leveraging a network of academic experts. The presence of multiple country-specific pages and customer support channels indicates a global outreach strategy. The partnership with www.myassignment-services.com for order processing suggests a distributed operational model. The company emphasizes value-added services like plagiarism checks and live consultations to differentiate itself. However, the lack of clear corporate registration and WHOIS transparency may affect business credibility in some markets.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses captcha to protect form submissions, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. The site uses third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which may have privacy implications if not properly disclosed. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Assignment Help Company
Description
Assignment Help Company provides online assignment help and homework help services with academic experts offering customized assignment solutions for university students worldwide, focusing on quality, convenience, and adherence to university marking rubrics.
Key services
Assignment Help, Dissertation Help, TAFE Assignments, CDR Writing, Case Study Help, Essay Writing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, intlTelInput plugin, datetimepicker plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Captcha on order form
  • Input validation on forms
  • Non-disclosure agreement mentioned

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive forms
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found in provided content
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain email and phone
  4. Multiple social media profiles linked with company branding
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Security headers are minimal; room for improvement
  7. WHOIS data missing, raising legitimacy concerns
  8. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  9. No explicit GDPR compliance statements found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Bootstrap framework, ensuring responsive design and good user experience across devices. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools for user tracking and engagement analysis. The site performance is moderate with room for optimization. The use of external scripts and plugins is well managed but requires security header enhancements to reduce risk. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but should focus on security hardening and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with assignmenthelpcompany.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review assignmenthelpcompany.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.