Skip to main content

Security report for aspone.cz

FORPSI · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASPone, operating under FORPSI and ASPone, s.r.o., is a specialized Czech web hosting provider focusing on ASP.NET and Microsoft-based hosting solutions. The company offers a range of hosting plans from free to VIP tiers, targeting developers and businesses requiring Windows Server environments with MSSQL and IIS support. Their market position is that of a leading Czech specialist in ASP.NET webhosting, supported by clear service offerings and professional website presentation. Technically, the website employs modern technologies including ASP.NET, .NET Core, MVC frameworks, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The infrastructure is Windows Server-based, with daily backups ensuring data resilience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website's professional content and contact transparency mitigate some concerns. Overall, the site is well-structured, privacy-conscious, and business credible, suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 7 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aspone.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASPone's business model centers on providing specialized ASP.NET web hosting services with multiple tiered plans catering to different customer needs, including free hosting options to attract entry-level users. Their competitive advantage lies in their focus on Microsoft technologies and daily backup services. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for hosting plans and add-on services like email hosting. The target customers are developers, SMEs, and enterprises requiring Windows-based hosting. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem evident from related subdomains and integrates major advertising and analytics platforms. Growth indicators include comprehensive service offerings and active cookie consent compliance. Strategic observations suggest a mature operation with potential to enhance security transparency and domain registration clarity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and daily backups for critical data. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, no explicit security policy or certifications are published, and security headers are not detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. Incident response contact is available via a misuse reporting page and support email, but no formal incident response framework is visible. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie management and privacy policy documentation. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and published security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.
  4. Establish and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FORPSI
Description
Webhosting na platformě Windows Server s podporou ASP.NET, MSSQL, IIS, MVC, Silverlight a mnoha dalšími technologiemi. ASPone je přední český specialista v oblasti ASP.NET webhostingu.
Key services
Webhosting Basic, Webhosting Developer, Webhosting Enterprise, Webhosting VIP, Email Hosting, Freehosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Windows Server, ASP.NET, MSSQL, IIS, MVC, Silverlight, AJAX, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
ASP.NET, .NET Core, MVC
Platforms
Windows Server
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Daily backups of web, databases, and emails

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. Multiple webhosting plans clearly described with pricing and features.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email and phone.
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy compliance.
  6. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. No explicit security policy or certifications published on site.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and daily backups for data protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Windows Server platform utilizing ASP.NET, .NET Core, and MVC frameworks, supported by MSSQL databases. It integrates client-side technologies like jQuery and uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. The site structure is well-organized with clear navigation and meta tags supporting SEO. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting appears self-managed or provided by ASPone itself. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential technical debt in mobile and accessibility compliance, which could impact user experience and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aspone.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aspone.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.