Skip to main content

Security report for asp.events

ASP Events · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASP Events is a specialized technology company focused on designing, building, hosting, and supporting event-specific websites for conferences, shows, and exhibitions worldwide. The company has established a strong market position as an award-winning event website specialist, serving a diverse global client base. Their key services include event website development, digital marketing, and integration with leading event technology platforms. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern JavaScript libraries, cookie consent management, and SEO optimization, reflecting a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, supporting a positive risk profile for business operations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of asp.events. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asp.events

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASP Events operates in the technology sector, targeting event organizers globally with a B2B service model. Their competitive advantage lies in their event-specific modules, award-winning service, and extensive client portfolio including reputable event organizers and partners. Revenue streams likely include website development, hosting, support, and digital marketing services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with integrations to multiple event technology providers. Strategic observations indicate a focus on quality, client satisfaction, and continuous innovation in event technology solutions.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA on forms, and cookie consent management via Cookiebot. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options were not clearly identified and should be verified. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance security culture and readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formalized policies and additional header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Ensure all forms have CSRF protection and robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Enhance contact information availability by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and integrations for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASP Events
Description
ASP Events designs, builds, hosts, and supports event-specific websites for conferences, shows, and exhibitions worldwide. They provide award-winning, feature-rich event websites tailored to organizers of all sizes.
Key services
Event website design and development, Hosting and support, Digital marketing services including SEO and CRO, Event-specific modules like exhibitor zones, speaker profiles, seminar programs, Integrations with event technology platforms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, ScriptJS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA, Slick Carousel, Lordicon
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Marketo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on event website solutions with detailed features and client portfolio.
  3. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  4. No exposed sensitive information or security warnings detected.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  8. Multiple reputable client and integration partner links present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, ScriptJS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA, and Slick Carousel. The CMS identified is SHOWOFF by ASP.events, a specialized platform for event websites. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and fonts, improving load times. Some images use lazy loading, though a few have lazyload errors which should be addressed to improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium22 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asp.events. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asp.events.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.