Skip to main content

Security report for asp.events

ASP Events · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASP Events is a specialized service provider focused on creating engaging, functional, and visually appealing websites for conferences, shows, and exhibitions. Their market position is that of a niche event website specialist catering primarily to event organizers and planners. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing a custom CMS named SHOWOFF by ASP.events, integrating common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The technical infrastructure is modern and supports mobile responsiveness and accessibility features, contributing to a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although the absence of explicit security headers and published security policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the risk profile is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the lack of visible contact information and privacy policy pages slightly reduces trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of asp.events. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asp.events

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASP Events operates in the technology sector, providing essential services for event website creation and management. Their business model revolves around service provision to event organizers, with key offerings including website design, hosting, and digital marketing support. The company appears to be small in size with consistent branding and professional content quality. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information in the public domain is typical for small businesses. Their partnership ecosystem includes integrations with Google services and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Growth indicators are not explicitly visible but the use of advanced cookie consent tools and analytics suggests a focus on compliance and data-driven marketing. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced transparency in contact and privacy disclosures to strengthen business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, allowing granular user control over data processing. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations. The website's use of third-party analytics and advertising services is transparent through the cookie consent dialog, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and compliance.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Include clear company contact information such as support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASP Events
Description
Events Website For Conferences, Shows & Exhibitions. Engaging, Functional and Visually Appealing Online Presence For Your Event.
Key services
Event website design, Event website hosting, Event digital marketing support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, ScriptJS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, Magnific Popup, TweenMax, ACSB Accessibility App
Frameworks
SHOWOFF by ASP.events
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed granular controls via Cookiebot.
  3. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  5. Website uses modern but common JavaScript libraries and Google services.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service page detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Content is focused on event website services with professional presentation.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS platform called SHOWOFF by ASP.events, leveraging common web technologies including jQuery 1.12.4, ScriptJS, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie management and privacy compliance. The site loads Google Fonts and uses accessibility tools such as ACSB. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of key images and fonts. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph and schema.org structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updating jQuery to a more recent version to reduce potential security risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence suitable for the target market.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 +4Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 71/100Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium22 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asp.events. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asp.events.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.