Skip to main content

Security report for askly.me

Askly OÜ · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Askly OÜ operates a professional SaaS platform providing AI-powered multilingual chat and customer support solutions primarily targeting e-commerce and retail businesses. The website demonstrates a strong market position with numerous notable clients and testimonials, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and enhanced customer engagement. The company leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and FullStory, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The technical implementation is robust, with responsive design, fast performance, and comprehensive SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit security policies are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for SaaS providers, but the website content and business presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching askly.me

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Askly targets businesses seeking to improve customer support through AI and automation, offering services such as AI assistants, chat widgets, analytics, and mobile apps. The company has a medium-sized footprint in the technology and e-commerce sectors, with a clear SaaS business model. Its client base includes well-known retail and service companies, enhancing its market credibility. The website's multilingual support and integrations with popular e-commerce platforms position Askly competitively. The marketing ecosystem includes partnerships with Calendly and use of advanced tracking and retargeting tools. The absence of phone contact but presence of multiple email contacts and social media channels suggests a digitally focused customer engagement strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of multiple third-party tracking and analytics scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks that require ongoing management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers appear to be missing or not detectable from the provided data, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with formal policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user privacy to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Askly OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Askly OÜ
Description
Askly ühendab inimeste ja tehisaru parimad omadused. Võimas tööriist müügi kasvatamiseks ja klientidega suhtlemiseks. Igal ajal, igas keeles, igal veebilehe platvormil.
Key services
AI assistant, Multilingual chat widget, Customer support automation, Analytics, Mobile and desktop apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, FullStory, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieConsent, Calendly integration, Async JavaScript loading, SVG injection
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes), jQuery (implied by plugins.js), Custom CSS frameworks
Platforms
Web, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, FullStory, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar, FullStory
Marketing tools
Calendly, Leadsy
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus
  3. Strong use of modern analytics and marketing technologies
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  7. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found
  8. Multiple social media profiles linked and active
  9. No forms collecting personal data directly on the main page
  10. Website is multilingual with language selection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, FullStory, and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. It employs Bootstrap for responsive design and custom CSS for branding consistency. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. The use of asynchronous script loading and SVG injection improves performance and visual quality. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not available. The site integrates with Calendly for demo bookings and supports multiple languages, enhancing user experience. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and well-maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 55/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with askly.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review askly.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.