Skip to main content

Security report for asecca.co.uk

ASECCA · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in DNS health, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASECCA is a technology service provider specializing in IT asset lifecycle management, offering a managed platform and services that provide full visibility, control, and sustainability for device estates. Their business model includes pay-as-you-go and subscription-based recycling and circularity services, targeting organizations seeking to optimize device reuse, reduce costs, and minimize environmental impact. The website demonstrates a professional design with clear service descriptions and user-friendly navigation, including options to schedule demos and product tours. Technically, the site employs modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS, jQuery, and integrates analytics and chat support tools. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query quota limits, limiting domain registration transparency. Overall, ASECCA presents as a credible small technology business with a focus on sustainability and IT asset management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 13 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching asecca.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
15
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ASECCA operates in the IT asset management sector, providing lifecycle management services that emphasize sustainability and cost efficiency. Their competitive advantage lies in combining technology platform capabilities with managed services, offering multiple service levels tailored to different business needs. The company targets medium to large organizations with steady device turnover or large estates requiring zero downtime. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and pay-per-device charges. The website's integration of demo scheduling and product tours indicates a focus on customer engagement and lead generation. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site suggests a smaller or privately held entity. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes third-party analytics and chat scripts, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, limiting transparency for security researchers. No contact information for incident response or abuse reporting is provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries visibly, which is positive. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a security@ or abuse@ email address and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans, especially for third-party scripts and libraries, to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASECCA
Description
ASECCA provides a fully managed platform and service for IT asset lifecycle management, offering visibility, control, and sustainability across device estates. Their services include device recycling, redeployment, replacement, and circularity solutions aimed at maximizing value recovery and reducing CO₂ emissions.
Key services
Recycling Pay As You Go, Recycling As A Service (RaaS), Circularity, Circularity Plus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Tailwind CSS, Social Intents Chat
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern frontend technologies and responsive design
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query quota limits
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  7. Website content is business-oriented and professional
  8. External scripts include analytics and chat support
  9. Navigation includes service descriptions and demo scheduling
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Tailwind CSS for styling and jQuery for DOM manipulation. It integrates Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and tracking, as well as Social Intents for chat support. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. The lack of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. The site uses HTTPS, indicating a valid SSL certificate. There is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with asecca.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review asecca.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.