Skip to main content

Security report for ascl.com

ASCL / Asiaspirit · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASCL (Asiaspirit) is a small technology service provider specializing in web design, hosting, e-commerce, and website promotion services. The company has a long-standing domain registration dating back to 1996, indicating an established presence in the market. Their website targets businesses and individuals seeking comprehensive internet presence solutions, offering a range of related services. Technically, the website is built on basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS, and shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement visible, no security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies published. Contact information is limited to a single email address, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site is functional but lacks modern security and privacy compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ascl.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on web design and hosting services with an international customer base. Its business model revolves around providing essential internet presence services including graphics optimization, e-commerce enablement, and search engine promotion. The domain age supports credibility, but the lack of detailed business information and limited contact channels may impact trust. The partnership with fer.com suggests some ecosystem collaboration. The website content is basic and somewhat dated, indicating potential for modernization to improve market positioning and customer engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies exposes the site to risks such as data interception and lack of user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve domain security. The site does not appear to use any advanced security frameworks or certifications. These gaps represent significant compliance and operational risks, especially in light of GDPR and other data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
  5. Modernize website design and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASCL / Asiaspirit
Description
From website design and hosting to extended site promotion, Asiaspirit provides all necessary and related services to a successful Internet presence.
Key services
Website design, Web server hosting, Graphics optimization, E-commerce solutions, Website promotion, Search engine optimization and listings, Website visibility enhancement
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides basic information about web design and hosting services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to email only; no phone or physical address provided.
  4. No modern security practices or compliance indicators visible.
  5. Website uses dated design and technology with limited mobile optimization.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. External links mostly related to partner or related sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies without modern frameworks or CMS. Hosting is managed via PDR Ltd. with DNS on supercp.com name servers. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features beyond basic meta tags. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical debt and potential security risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and requires modernization to meet current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ascl.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ascl.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.