Skip to main content

Security report for arz.at

Accenture · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Accenture Austria operates as a leading management consulting, technology services, and outsourcing company, serving clients primarily in Germany and Austria. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, strong branding, and extensive service offerings across multiple sectors including technology, energy, finance, and manufacturing. The technical infrastructure leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS and a suite of Adobe marketing and analytics tools, hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring a robust platform for content delivery and user engagement. However, the site suffers from a critical security shortfall due to an invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which undermines user trust and data security. Security headers are implemented but the Content-Security-Policy is weak, allowing unsafe script execution. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies managed via OneTrust. Overall, the site is professional and credible but requires urgent remediation of SSL and CSP issues to enhance security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arz.at

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Accenture's market position as a global leader in consulting and technology services is reinforced by its extensive service portfolio and recognized certifications such as Fortune's World's Most Admired Companies and Great Place to Work®. The business model focuses on delivering high-value consulting and technology solutions to enterprise clients across diverse industries. The website targets business customers seeking digital transformation and operational excellence. The presence of multiple localized language versions and detailed service navigation indicates a strategic approach to market segmentation and customer engagement. The company leverages a sophisticated marketing and analytics ecosystem to optimize user experience and conversion. No suspicious or inconsistent domain registration patterns were found, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with several best practices in place, including security headers like X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security. However, the invalid SSL certificate and absence of TLS 1.2 or 1.3 protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and data interception. The Content-Security-Policy is permissive with 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', increasing the risk of cross-site scripting attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of reputable third-party scripts and consent management tools indicates awareness of privacy and security concerns but requires tightening of technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately renew and deploy a valid SSL certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 to secure all communications.
  2. Strengthen the Content-Security-Policy by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives to mitigate XSS risks.
  3. Implement and publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, integrating Adobe marketing and analytics technologies such as Adobe DTM Reactor, Adobe Target, and Adobe Personalization. It uses Amazon CloudFront as a CDN for content delivery. The site includes modern UI components like carousels and video backgrounds, optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. However, performance metrics are not provided, and SSL/TLS configuration is inadequate, which is a significant technical risk. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the technical stack is modern and enterprise-grade but requires urgent security upgrades to SSL and CSP configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arz.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arz.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.