Skip to main content

Security report for arxiv.org

arXiv · Education · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

arXiv.org is a well-established, non-profit open-access repository for scholarly articles primarily in physics, mathematics, computer science, and related fields. Founded in 1998 and affiliated with Cornell University, it serves a global academic audience by providing free access to nearly 2.4 million research papers. The platform is supported by donations and member institutions, positioning it as a leading resource in the academic publishing ecosystem. Technically, the website employs a custom-built infrastructure with standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. It is hosted using Google Cloud DNS services, ensuring reliable performance and good mobile optimization. The site is accessible, well-structured, and optimized for search engines, though it lacks some modern security headers and DNSSEC implementation. From a security perspective, arXiv uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but could enhance its posture by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy, though no cookie consent mechanism was detected. The absence of advertising and tracking scripts reflects a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, arXiv.org demonstrates a high level of business credibility and technical maturity, with minor security improvements recommended. The site is safe, professional, and trusted by its academic user base.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of arxiv.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 24 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arxiv.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

arXiv holds a dominant position as a free, open-access preprint repository serving researchers and academics worldwide. Its non-profit business model relies on institutional support and donations, avoiding commercial advertising or tracking. The platform's extensive subject categorization and search capabilities cater to diverse scientific disciplines, enhancing user engagement. Strategic partnerships with Cornell University and the Simons Foundation reinforce its credibility and sustainability. Growth indicators include a large and growing archive of scholarly articles and continuous support from member institutions. The absence of direct commercial revenue streams suggests a focus on community service and academic dissemination rather than profit.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections active. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy practices are strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and minimal user tracking. The absence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for an academic repository but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to align with privacy best practices and regulations.
  5. Consider providing direct contact emails or phone numbers for support and security reporting to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
arXiv
Description
arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for nearly 2.4 million scholarly articles in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. Materials on this site are not peer-reviewed by arXiv.
Key services
Open-access distribution of scholarly articles, Search and browse scientific papers, Subject-specific archives and classifications
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and targeted at academic audiences.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, but privacy policy is comprehensive.
  4. No visible phone numbers or direct email addresses on main site; contact via contact page.
  5. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious design.
  6. Security could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom content management approach with standard web technologies, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting via Google Cloud DNS provides reliable infrastructure. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and subject categorization, supporting excellent user experience. However, the absence of modern security headers and DNSSEC indicates some technical debt in security practices. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be modernized with enhanced security features and formalized policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 −1Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 −1Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 70/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arxiv.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arxiv.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.