Skip to main content

Security report for arxiv.org

arXiv · Education · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

arXiv is a well-established, non-profit open-access repository hosting nearly 2.4 million scholarly articles across multiple scientific disciplines. It operates under the auspices of Cornell University and is supported by the Simons Foundation and member institutions. The platform targets researchers, academics, and students worldwide, providing free access to preprints and scholarly materials without peer review. Its market position is strong as a leading academic resource in physics, mathematics, computer science, and related fields. Technically, the website uses a custom-built platform with standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It is hosted with Google Cloud DNS and uses multiple Google Cloud name servers. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and performs well with fast loading times. SEO and navigation are well implemented, supporting a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. No cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may impact privacy compliance. No advertising or tracking scripts are present, indicating a privacy-respecting approach. Overall, arXiv presents a high level of trustworthiness and professionalism with a strong business credibility score. The main risks relate to minor security and privacy compliance gaps, which can be addressed to further enhance the platform's security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of arxiv.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 16 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arxiv.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

arXiv operates as a non-profit academic repository with a business model based on open access and community support through donations and institutional memberships. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive archive, subject-specific categorization, and affiliation with Cornell University and the Simons Foundation. The platform serves a global academic audience, including researchers and students, and maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with member institutions. Growth indicators include a large and continuously expanding archive and a well-recognized brand in the academic community. The absence of commercial advertising supports its mission-driven approach.

Security posture

The current security maturity of arXiv is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration protections are in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and the absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is generally good but could be improved with cookie consent mechanisms and clearer data protection disclosures. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, suggesting room for improvement in these areas.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security documentation to maintain trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
arXiv
Description
arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for nearly 2.4 million scholarly articles in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. Materials on this site are not peer-reviewed by arXiv.
Key services
Open-access scholarly article distribution, Subject-specific archives and search, Advanced search and browsing by categories
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is highly relevant to academic and research communities.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  5. Strong affiliation with Cornell University and Simons Foundation enhances trust.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom platform using standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS, JavaScript) with no detected third-party CMS. Hosting is via Google Cloud DNS with multiple Google name servers, indicating a robust infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is fast with no broken elements detected. There is an opportunity to modernize by adopting additional frameworks or CMS solutions to streamline maintenance and enhance features. Technical risks are minimal but include the lack of DNSSEC and limited visible security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 68/100 −2Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 70/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arxiv.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arxiv.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.