Skip to main content

Security report for arvato-systems.com

Arvato Systems · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arvato Systems is a large, internationally active IT specialist and multi-cloud service provider headquartered in Germany, focused on enabling digital transformation for enterprises across various industries including healthcare, energy, retail, manufacturing, and government. The company offers a broad portfolio of services such as cloud transformation, application modernization, managed services, security services, and SAP solutions. Their market position is reinforced by multiple industry awards and certifications, including ISO 27001. Technically, the website is built on CoreMedia CMS with modern web technologies and provides a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. However, the security posture is weakened by an invalid or missing SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which are critical issues that should be addressed promptly. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arvato-systems.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention arvato-systems.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for arvato-systems.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Arvato Systems operates as an essential entity in the IT services sector, targeting enterprises seeking digital transformation and cloud adoption. Their business model revolves around consulting, cloud services, managed operations, and technology partnerships with major cloud providers like AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, and SAP. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and showcases numerous customer projects and industry awards, indicating a robust market presence and competitive advantage. Their focus on sustainability, digital sovereignty, and security further positions them as a forward-thinking IT service provider. The presence of multiple regional domains and subsidiaries reflects a global footprint. Revenue streams likely include consulting fees, managed services contracts, and software solutions.

Security posture

The current security posture reveals a mixed maturity level. While email authentication mechanisms such as SPF and DMARC are properly configured with strict policies, the website suffers from a critical lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential risks and undermining trust. The site employs HSTS with preload and includes subdomains, which is a positive security practice. No known SSL vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected. However, the absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption mechanisms indicates room for improvement in certificate validation and performance. There is no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found, which could be a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and correctly install a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and support modern TLS protocols (1.2 and 1.3).
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and enable session resumption to improve security and performance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy disclosures with explicit data retention policies and user rights information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses CoreMedia CMS and modern front-end technologies including JavaScript and CSS with responsive design. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5.9 seconds and 105 resources loaded. The site includes multimedia content such as videos and image sliders powered by Slick Slider. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are present but not deeply analyzed. The DNS setup is robust with multiple authoritative name servers and valid SPF and DMARC records. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical risks that could impact user trust and search engine ranking. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arvato-systems.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arvato-systems.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.