Skip to main content

Security report for artoffiber.com

Art of fiber · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Art of Fiber is a technology company specializing in innovative exhibitor management solutions for the event servicing industry. Their platform offers a full-service marketplace enabling venues, organizers, and exhibitors to digitize, simplify, and automate the process of designing and ordering exhibition stands. The company positions itself as an innovative leader, trusted by leading venues and contractors globally, with a focus on improving exhibitor experiences and operational efficiency. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with integrations for Google Analytics and Tag Manager, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with modern design and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent implemented but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though improvements in security transparency and privacy documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching artoffiber.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Art of Fiber operates in the technology sector, targeting the event servicing industry including venues, organizers, and exhibitors. Their business model revolves around a marketplace platform that streamlines exhibitor stand design and ordering, coupled with digital event management tools and concierge services. The company was founded in 2020 and has established a credible market presence with endorsements from notable clients. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, service fees, and integrations. The company leverages partnerships with event venues and contractors, though no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include a modern website with active marketing and SEO efforts. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation and digital transformation within a niche market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Cloudflare for DNS, enhancing availability and basic security. The domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection represents a security gap. No public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which is managed with a cookie consent banner. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security posture.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact information and security policies to demonstrate commitment to security governance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Art of fiber
Description
Innovative exhibitor management. Digitised, simplified, and automated. Empower your exhibitors with tools to create and order stands in minutes.
Key services
Exhibitor shopping experience, Digital event management, Standbuilding technology, Marketplace integrations, Concierge services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.25.11, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional business site for event exhibitor management technology.
  2. Content is rich and well structured with modern design.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact likely via contact page form.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is relatively new but consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a well-supported and extensible platform. It uses Google Fonts, jQuery, Swiper.js for carousels, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, which may provide CDN and DDoS protection. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and image carousels, optimized for desktop and mobile. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and skip links present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with artoffiber.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review artoffiber.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.