Skip to main content

Security report for aristocratinteractive.com

Aristocrat Interactive · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aristocrat Interactive is a newly founded (2024) global leader in regulated Real Money Gaming (RMG), offering a comprehensive suite of online gaming, iLottery, sports betting, and content aggregation services. As a subsidiary of Aristocrat Leisure Limited, it leverages proprietary gaming content and advanced technology platforms to serve operators and players in regulated markets worldwide. The company targets casino operators, government lotteries, and sports betting providers with scalable, customizable solutions across five main business segments. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. Hosting is provided by WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with a valid SSL certificate but unusual TLS configuration disabling all common TLS versions, which may impact compatibility and security. The site includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security or incident response policies. Overall, Aristocrat Interactive presents a professional, trustworthy digital presence aligned with its market leadership and business model.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aristocratinteractive.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aristocratinteractive.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a key player in the regulated online gaming industry, combining content aggregation with proprietary game studios and technology platforms. Its business model focuses on B2B services, providing full-service platforms, managed services, and white-label solutions to operators. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and partnerships enhances its content portfolio and market reach. Growth indicators include recent landmark contracts and expansion into new regulated markets. The company maintains a strong brand identity and leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience. Its partnership ecosystem includes its parent company and specialized studios, supporting a diversified product offering.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The website uses a valid SSL certificate issued by a trusted issuer, but disables all TLS versions (1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3), which is atypical and may cause client compatibility issues or weaken encryption standards. No known SSL/TLS vulnerabilities are detected. Security headers are present but basic, lacking advanced protections like CSP or HSTS. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with an age gate popup enhancing regulatory compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing website but could be improved to meet higher standards expected in regulated gaming environments.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) to ensure secure and compatible encrypted connections.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aristocrat Technologies Inc.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is modern and well-structured, using WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and advanced JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and Typed.js for interactive UI elements. Hosting is on WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN, providing fast load times and good mobile responsiveness. SEO is optimized with Rank Math plugin and structured data is implemented via JSON-LD for enhanced search engine understanding. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is unusual, disabling all TLS versions, which may cause technical risks and user access issues. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, with cookie consent mechanisms in place. Technical debt appears low, but security configuration requires modernization to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aristocratinteractive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aristocratinteractive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.