Skip to main content

Security report for aricoma.com

ARICOMA · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARICOMA is a prominent enterprise IT service provider focused on delivering end-to-end IT solutions and digital transformation services primarily in Europe. The company targets commercial businesses and public sector organizations, offering a broad portfolio including enterprise applications, cybersecurity, cloud services, and professional services. It positions itself as a market leader (#1) in enterprise IT with a strong emphasis on innovation and digital readiness. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including Kentico CMS, Bootstrap, and multiple analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, but the overall professional presentation and business information support a credible enterprise profile.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aricoma.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aricoma.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ARICOMA operates as an essential entity in the technology sector, serving diverse industries such as manufacturing, banking, energy, transport, healthcare, and government. Its business model revolves around IT services and digital transformation, supported by a parent company KKCG and multiple subsidiaries acquired recently. The company demonstrates strong market positioning with significant revenue and a large customer base. Its partnership ecosystem and certifications enhance its competitive advantage. The website content and structure indicate a focus on enterprise clients and public institutions, with a clear growth trajectory and strategic acquisitions to expand capabilities and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file or clear incident response contacts represent gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through detailed privacy policies. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information, including security or abuse email addresses, to increase trust and compliance.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ARICOMA
Description
Provider of a wide range of end-to-end services and IT solutions that help commercial businesses grow and for the public sector to deliver more efficient services. Aims to become a major player in end-to-end IT services and digital transformation in Europe.
Key services
Enterprise Applications, Digital Government Transformation, IT Infrastructure, Enterprise Cybersecurity, Cloud Services, Professional Services, Services for EU Institutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.5.3, Splide.js, Lightbox, Google Fonts (Rubik), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding and consistent professional design.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  5. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tracking tools.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit incident response or security contact information found.
  9. Website targets enterprise IT clients and public sector organizations.
  10. Multiple subsidiary acquisitions mentioned in news and press releases.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Kentico CMS, Bootstrap 4.5.3, jQuery, and various JavaScript libraries for UI components and analytics. It integrates multiple marketing and tracking services including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a sophisticated approach to user behavior analysis and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of critical CSS. The presence of reCAPTCHA enhances form security. However, the absence of some security headers and lack of explicit hosting provider information suggest areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aricoma.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aricoma.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.