Skip to main content

Security report for arena-z.gg

Players Arena Foundation · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ARENA-Z is a Web3 gaming platform that offers a diverse portfolio of blockchain-integrated games spanning multiple genres such as RPG, strategy, shooter, and social casino. The platform targets blockchain enthusiasts and gamers interested in digital asset ownership and multiplayer experiences. Supported by partnerships with recognized blockchain and gaming entities, ARENA-Z positions itself as an emerging player in the Web3 gaming ecosystem. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with additional use of Vue.js and Firebase for media hosting. The platform employs Google Analytics for user tracking but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though dedicated security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and content-rich, but could improve privacy compliance and transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and enhancing contact visibility to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arena-z.gg

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector focusing on Web3 gaming, offering blockchain-based games with token utility and digital asset interoperability. Its business model revolves around game development, token ecosystems, and community engagement through social platforms. The company benefits from partnerships with notable blockchain projects and investors, enhancing its market credibility. Target customers include casual and tactical gamers interested in blockchain gaming. The platform's growth is supported by multiple games in various development stages and live deployment. Revenue streams likely include tokenomics, in-game purchases, and digital asset trading. The partnership ecosystem includes blockchain infrastructure providers, gaming studios, and investment firms, indicating a robust strategic network.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no known vulnerabilities were detected. Compliance with GDPR is partially evidenced by the privacy policy, but lack of cookie consent mechanisms is a gap. The platform should enhance its security culture by publishing incident response contacts and vulnerability reporting channels to improve trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Increase transparency by providing clear contact information for support and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Players Arena Foundation
Description
ARENA-Z is a Web3 gaming platform offering a portfolio of blockchain-based games including League of Kingdoms, LOK Chronicle, XOCIETY, The New Order, Pebble City, and LOK Hunters. The platform focuses on multiplayer, RPG, strategy, shooter, and social casino genres, integrating blockchain technology for digital asset ownership and gameplay interoperability.
Key services
Blockchain-based multiplayer games, Digital asset trading and ownership, Token utility and seasonal reward systems, Cross-game interoperability
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Vue.js 2.6.14, Google Tag Manager, Firebase Storage, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Web3 gaming platform with multiple blockchain-based games
  2. Uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React
  3. Includes Google Analytics for tracking
  4. Has published privacy policy and terms of service hosted on Google Docs
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main site
  6. No cookie consent banner detected
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. Partners include well-known blockchain and gaming entities
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Next.js and React, with Vue.js used for certain components. Media assets are hosted on Firebase Storage, indicating cloud infrastructure usage. Google Tag Manager is employed for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and uses multiple CSS stylesheets for design consistency. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD detected. No CMS is identified, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of visible cookie consent which may impact compliance. Opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and privacy compliance to enhance overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arena-z.gg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arena-z.gg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.