Skip to main content

Security report for archway.io

Archway Network · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Archway Network is a technology platform focused on providing a multi-chain launchpad for decentralized applications (dapps) and smart contracts. It targets blockchain developers seeking to deploy and monetize their applications globally with automated rewards. The platform positions itself as a developer-centric blockchain ecosystem with modern tooling and incentives. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Tailwind CSS and likely Vue.js/Nuxt.js, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Tracking and marketing pixels from major platforms are extensively used, indicating a moderate to extensive user tracking level. No contact information or incident response details are provided, which limits transparency. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate tech startup. Recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and providing clear contact and security incident channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching archway.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Archway operates in the blockchain technology sector, offering a platform service model that incentivizes developers through rewards. Its market positioning as a multi-chain launchpad targets a niche of blockchain developers and projects. The business model likely includes network fees, developer incentives, and ecosystem growth strategies. The company was founded in 2020 and uses privacy protection for domain registration, common for startups. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and professional content. The presence of social media channels and developer documentation indicates an active community engagement strategy. No direct business contact details or certifications are published, which could be improved to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing a solid baseline for transport security. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to prevent DNS spoofing. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy reduces transparency and incident response readiness. No contact emails or phone numbers related to security or abuse were found. Tracking scripts are present but no sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with additional headers, DNSSEC, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page with contact information for incident reporting.
  5. Include clear contact information for business and security inquiries to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Archway Network
Description
Archway is the best way for developers to launch decentralized apps (dapps) & smart contracts on a global scale while earning auto-magic rewards
Key services
Launchpad for decentralized apps, Smart contract deployment, Auto-magic rewards for developers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS, Vue.js/Nuxt.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Analytics (via Pixel), Quora Analytics, Reddit Analytics, Twitter Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional blockchain developer platform
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  3. Extensive use of tracking and marketing pixels
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  6. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with business type
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. Good technical implementation with modern frameworks and responsive design
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Tailwind CSS for styling and likely Vue.js or Nuxt.js for frontend framework, indicated by the presence of __nuxt div and script naming conventions. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads quickly and is well optimized for mobile devices. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are properly configured. The use of multiple marketing and tracking pixels indicates a mature marketing infrastructure but raises privacy considerations. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The site has good accessibility features and a professional design. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with archway.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review archway.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.