Skip to main content

Security report for arcade.software

Arcade Software · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arcade Software operates a SaaS platform focused on enabling teams to build AI-powered interactive demos quickly and efficiently. The company targets marketing, product, sales, customer success, and enablement teams, providing tools for demo creation, lead generation, personalization, and analytics. The website positions Arcade as a modern, scalable solution with a strong user base of over 20,000 companies and positive customer feedback. Technically, the site leverages a modern tech stack including Webflow CMS, PostHog analytics, Google Tag Manager, and various marketing pixels, ensuring a performant and mobile-optimized user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though cookie consent mechanisms and vulnerability disclosure information could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for tech startups. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, publishing vulnerability disclosure details, and improving contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arcade.software

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention arcade.software, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for arcade.software right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Arcade is well positioned in the technology sector as a SaaS provider of interactive demo solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in AI-powered demo creation, ease of use, and integration capabilities. The business model revolves around subscription-based SaaS offerings with multiple tools including browser extensions, desktop apps, and plugins. The target customers are primarily B2B teams in marketing, product, and sales functions. Growth indicators include a large customer base and positive G2 reviews. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem through integrations with major analytics and CRM platforms. Operationally, the company emphasizes brand consistency, customer engagement, and rapid iteration of demos. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. The use of modern analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations, though the absence of a cookie consent banner and vulnerability disclosure page indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were detected. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be a gap in readiness. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced communication of security policies and certifications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact details on the security page to improve readiness and trust.
  4. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to strengthen credibility.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arcade Software
Description
Arcade is an interactive demo platform that allows teams to create effortlessly beautiful demos in minutes.
Key services
Interactive demo creation, Lead generation, Personalization, Integrations with other tools, Analytics and engagement tracking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, PostHog analytics, Intercom, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Chrome Extension, Desktop App, Figma Plugin
Platforms
Web, Chrome Extension, Desktop (MacOS), Figma Plugin
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Secure forms with no visible injection points

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, PostHog, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Intercom, PostHog, Koala, G2 Attribution
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive demos.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are present and comprehensive.
  5. No visible cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations.
  7. Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
  10. Website is mobile optimized and performant.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, supported by a suite of analytics and marketing tools such as PostHog, Google Tag Manager, and various tracking pixels. The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with clean, valid HTML and CSS. The use of browser extensions, desktop apps, and plugins indicates a diversified platform approach. No technical debt or legacy technology was observed. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and security transparency. The technical risks are minimal, with no visible vulnerabilities or outdated libraries.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100 +4Low27 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arcade.software. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arcade.software.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.