Skip to main content

Security report for arborxr.com

ArborXR · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ArborXR is a technology company specializing in enterprise-grade management solutions for AR and VR devices. Their platform enables organizations to remotely manage XR devices, deploy content, and customize user experiences with features such as kiosk mode and ArborXR Home Launcher. The company is positioned as a market leader, trusted by over 3,000 companies including Fortune 500 firms and preferred by Qualcomm. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong trust signals including media coverage and customer testimonials. Technically, the site is built on Webflow, hosted via Cloudflare, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and HubSpot. However, a critical security issue exists due to an invalid SSL certificate and disabled modern TLS protocols, which significantly impacts the security posture. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is professional and credible but requires urgent security improvements to ensure safe user interactions and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching arborxr.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
70
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ArborXR operates in the technology sector, focusing on XR device management SaaS solutions for enterprises. Their business model revolves around subscription-based services targeting large-scale deployments in industries such as healthcare, education, and corporate training. The company leverages partnerships with major industry players like Qualcomm and has garnered significant media attention, enhancing its market credibility. The platform's features address key pain points in XR device management, including bulk enrollment, remote content deployment, and device lockdown. The presence of a podcast and XR directory indicates an ecosystem approach to customer engagement and developer relations. The company appears to be medium-sized with a strong emphasis on customer support and enterprise security. Their digital marketing strategy includes SEO, content marketing, and social proof via G2 reviews and testimonials.

Security posture

The website demonstrates some adherence to security best practices with headers like CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options configured. Cookies are set with HttpOnly and Secure flags. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of support for TLS 1.2 and 1.3 protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential interception and downgrade attacks. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption further weakens the SSL/TLS implementation. DNSSEC is not enabled, and CAA records are malformed, indicating DNS security gaps. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which may hinder coordinated security incident handling. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism, potentially exposing the company to GDPR non-compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately fix and renew the SSL certificate to ensure valid HTTPS connections and enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Correct DNS CAA records and consider enabling DNSSEC for enhanced DNS security.
  4. Publish a security.txt file or a vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL/TLS performance and security.
  6. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies including jQuery and integrates with marketing and analytics platforms such as Google Tag Manager and HubSpot. Hosting is provided by Cloudflare, which offers CDN and security features. The site includes embedded Wistia videos for rich media content. Performance is moderate with no explicit load time data but optimized image usage and responsive design indicate good mobile optimization. Accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines and font smoothing are implemented. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, the invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols pose significant technical risks that could impact user trust and search engine rankings. The site uses multiple external domains for content delivery and tracking, which should be monitored for privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with arborxr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review arborxr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.