Skip to main content

Security report for aqua-incubator.com

AQUA incubator · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AQUA incubator is a blockchain-focused incubation service provider that empowers top-tier web3 projects with strategic, operational, and community support. The company positions itself as a joint venture with over 40 years of combined experience and a proven track record supporting more than 300 projects, generating significant trading volume. Their services encompass full-service incubation, marketing, fundraising, community building, and business consultation. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web technologies and includes advanced 3D animations, indicating a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and incident response disclosures. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy and cookie policy present but no consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 15 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aqua-incubator.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets blockchain startups and projects seeking incubation and marketing support. Its competitive advantage lies in its experienced team, extensive network of KOLs, and partnerships with major exchanges and media outlets. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through incubation packages and consulting. The presence of multiple publishing and listing partners enhances credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include a large portfolio and active community engagement. The company operates in the technology and finance sectors, with a medium-sized team and a history dating back to 2016. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive service offering position AQUA incubator as a significant player in the blockchain incubation space.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contact information is provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is incomplete, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Add a security.txt file and clearly publish incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and response readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish terms of service and a dedicated security policy to improve legal and security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS domain registration data to ensure consistency and legitimacy of domain ownership.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DSN Imaging
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AQUA incubator
Description
AQUA incubator empowers top-tier blockchain projects with strategic, operational, and community support to evolve into market leaders shaping the future of digital finance and blockchain.
Key services
Full-service incubation, Marketing strategy and KOL campaigns, Fundraising and tokenomics advisory, Community building and moderation, Business consultation and partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, Spline 3D animations, jQuery 3.5.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
KOL campaigns, Social media marketing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive 3D animations.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered, which is unusual.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and professional.
  5. No explicit privacy consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence.
  6. No terms of service or security policy documents found.
  7. No security.txt or incident response info available.
  8. Website uses modern Webflow CMS and Google Fonts.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts and jQuery for frontend functionality. It incorporates advanced 3D animations via Spline, enhancing user engagement. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable performance. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content structure. SEO is basic but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and SEO optimization. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aqua-incubator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aqua-incubator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.