Skip to main content

Security report for aqas.eu

AQAS e.V. · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AQAS e.V. is a German-based agency specializing in quality assurance and accreditation services for higher education institutions. The organization offers programme accreditation, institutional accreditation/audit, and consulting services. It holds recognized certifications from European and international accreditation bodies, positioning it as a reputable player in the education accreditation sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting universities and educational stakeholders primarily in Europe. The business model is non-profit and service-oriented, focusing on accreditation processes and quality assurance in higher education. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and includes modern web technologies such as jQuery and UberMenu for navigation. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with no major technical issues detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses mail obfuscation to protect email addresses. However, it lacks several recommended security headers and does not provide explicit security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is supported by the presence of a comprehensive privacy policy and legal pages, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and transparency. The overall risk assessment is low, with no signs of malicious activity or suspicious content. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is common and justified for this type of organization. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aqas.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aqas.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aqas.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AQAS e.V. operates in the education sector as a specialized accreditation agency. Its market positioning is strong within European higher education quality assurance frameworks, supported by certifications from EQAR, ENQA, and other bodies. The agency's competitive advantage lies in its recognized accreditations and comprehensive service offerings. Revenue streams likely derive from accreditation fees and consulting services. The target customer segments include universities, higher education institutions, and possibly governmental education authorities. Growth indicators include a 20-year history and active news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes major European accreditation organizations, enhancing credibility and reach. Operationally, the agency maintains a focused and professional web presence, reflecting a stable and mature business model.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of mail obfuscation indicates attention to privacy. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, which are best practices for responsible security management. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by adopting additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to increase trust and preparedness visibility.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular audits to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AQAS e.V.
Description
Agency for quality assurance at universities based in Cologne
Key services
Programme Accreditation, Institutional Accreditation/Audit, Consulting and Accreditation References
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, UberMenu plugin, HTML5 Details Polyfill
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of mail obfuscator script

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for an accreditation agency
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  3. Privacy and legal pages are present and accessible
  4. No forms detected on homepage
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection
  8. Certifications and partner logos enhance trust
  9. No advertising or marketing scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, which is widely used and supported. It employs jQuery and UberMenu for enhanced navigation and user experience. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized, with good SEO meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt or errors detected in the HTML. However, the site could benefit from improved accessibility features and performance optimizations such as caching and minification. Hosting details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for the organization's needs but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aqas.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aqas.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.