Skip to main content

Security report for apsis.se

APSIS · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APSIS is a Swedish technology company specializing in marketing technology solutions, offering a comprehensive SaaS platform called Apsis One that integrates AI-driven email marketing, marketing automation, SMS marketing, event management, and CRM integrations. The company targets modern marketers and businesses seeking to optimize their digital marketing efforts with data-driven tools. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, providing clear navigation and multiple calls to action such as free trials and demos. Technically, the site uses Drupal 10 CMS and integrates popular marketing and tracking technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, which is a critical security deficiency. Security headers are present but the absence of TLS protocols and valid certificates significantly lowers the security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms implemented. Contact information is primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers were found. WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing no suspicious registration patterns. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility and privacy compliance but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security to protect user data and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apsis.se

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

APSIS operates in the competitive marketing technology sector with a focus on AI and automation to enhance customer engagement and marketing effectiveness. Its SaaS business model includes free trials and demos to attract users. The company is part of the Efficy group, with related subsidiaries such as APSIS Pro, APSIS Lead, and APSIS Asia, indicating a broad market presence. The platform offers a wide range of integrated marketing tools, appealing to medium-sized businesses and marketers aiming to consolidate their MarTech stack. The website content and external links reflect a mature marketing ecosystem with strong partner relationships. The lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, likely for lead management. The company’s market position is solid in Sweden with international reach through subsidiaries.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While security headers such as Content Security Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options are implemented, their effectiveness is undermined by the missing TLS protocols. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption features indicates room for improvement in SSL performance and reliability. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Privacy compliance is good with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site requires immediate SSL/TLS remediation to meet modern security standards and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols and disable legacy insecure protocols.
  3. Enhance HSTS policy by enabling includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Slick Carousel, and Lottie Player. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO practices including meta tags, canonical URLs, and structured JSON-LD data. Performance metrics are not provided but inferred as slow due to zero loadTime and resourceCount data. The site uses multiple external marketing and tracking scripts, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. However, the lack of valid SSL/TLS certificates and disabled HTTPS protocols represent a significant technical risk. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site’s technical implementation is otherwise solid with good content structure and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apsis.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apsis.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.