Skip to main content

Security report for apsis.dk

APSIS · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APSIS is a Denmark-based technology company specializing in AI-driven email marketing and marketing automation solutions through its flagship platform, Apsis One. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of marketing tools including email marketing, AI assistant, SMS marketing, CRM, and integrations designed to empower marketers to create personalized and data-driven customer experiences. The company operates under the parent company Efficy and serves a medium-sized market segment with a strong focus on seamless user experience and advanced marketing capabilities. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. However, the website currently suffers from a critical security issue due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which significantly impacts its security posture. Despite this, the site maintains good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and no exposed sensitive data was detected. Overall, APSIS presents a professional and trustworthy marketing technology provider with room for improvement in its security infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apsis.dk

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention apsis.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for apsis.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

APSIS holds a competitive position in the marketing technology sector by offering an all-in-one platform that integrates AI capabilities and marketing automation tools. Its business model is SaaS-based with free trial and demo options to attract new customers. The company targets marketers and businesses looking for data-driven marketing solutions and emphasizes ease of use and rapid onboarding. APSIS benefits from its association with Efficy and related subsidiaries, expanding its market reach. The platform's integration capabilities and AI assistant feature provide a competitive advantage. The company actively uses customer testimonials and resource downloads to build trust and credibility. Its marketing ecosystem includes multiple external analytics and tracking services, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security best practices such as HSTS with includeSubDomains, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options headers. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of support for modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) are critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential risks. The site does not implement OCSP stapling or session resumption, which could improve TLS performance and security. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The overall security maturity is low due to these gaps, which could impact user trust and compliance with security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure the SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and support modern TLS protocols (1.2 and 1.3).
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance TLS performance and security.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as Slick Carousel and integrating multiple marketing and analytics scripts including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Hosting is via IP 185.157.223.250 with DNS hosted on dnshost.net. Performance metrics were not provided, but the site structure and resource usage suggest moderate performance. The invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and risk. The site uses a comprehensive content security policy and other security headers, but the lack of HTTPS undermines these protections. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades to meet industry standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apsis.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apsis.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.