Skip to main content

Security report for appspot.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

This website is the Google Accounts sign-in page specifically for accessing the Google Cloud Console App Engine service. It serves as a secure authentication gateway for Google Cloud users, primarily targeting developers, IT professionals, and enterprise customers. As part of Google LLC, a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., the site reflects a mature and well-established technology business with a global market presence. The business model revolves around cloud computing services and user account management, positioning Google as a market leader in technology and cloud infrastructure. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, JSON-LD structured data, and Google APIs. It is hosted on Google's infrastructure, ensuring fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility. The site uses HTTPS with strong security headers and content security policies, demonstrating a robust security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. From a security perspective, the site follows best practices with enforced HTTPS, secure cookies, and comprehensive security headers. However, as a login page, it does not display privacy or cookie policies directly, which are typically linked elsewhere on Google's main sites. The absence of direct contact or incident response information on this page is standard for such authentication portals. Overall, the site is highly trustworthy, professional, and secure, with no indications of suspicious activity or content safety concerns. The domain is a subdomain of google.com, a highly reputable domain with a long history. The lack of WHOIS data for the subdomain is normal and does not impact legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include maintaining current security standards, ensuring privacy compliance is clearly communicated on related pages, and continuous monitoring for emerging threats.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of appspot.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching appspot.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention appspot.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
142,804
Employees
0
Customers
142,095
Third parties
709
Weak passwords
30%

9,979 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for appspot.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC operates as a global technology giant with a dominant position in cloud computing and internet services. The Google Cloud Console is a critical platform for developers and enterprises to manage cloud resources. Google's business model includes cloud services, advertising, and software products. The company benefits from strong brand recognition, extensive infrastructure, and a broad partner ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous expansion of cloud offerings and integration with other Google services. The company targets a wide range of customers from individual developers to large enterprises, emphasizing scalability and security. Strategic observations highlight Google's focus on innovation, security, and compliance to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The security posture of the Google Accounts sign-in page is strong, leveraging HTTPS, modern security headers, and secure coding practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the page content. The site lacks direct links to security policies or incident response contacts on this page, which is typical for login portals but should be accessible elsewhere. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is implied by Google's global operations but not explicitly shown here. Incident response readiness is high at the corporate level but not visible on this page. Overall, the security maturity is advanced, with recommendations to maintain vigilance and transparency in privacy and security communications.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure privacy and cookie policies are easily accessible from all user-facing pages, including login portals.
  2. Maintain and regularly update security headers and HTTPS configurations to adhere to best practices.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on related support or corporate pages.
  4. Enhance transparency around data protection and GDPR compliance for end users.
  5. Continue investing in security monitoring and vulnerability management to protect user accounts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google LLC provides a cloud console platform and account management services.
Key services
Cloud Console, Account Sign-In, Authentication Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google APIs, JSON-LD, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Google Closure Library (implied)
Platforms
Google Cloud Platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with extensive use of Google APIs and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced semantic understanding. The hosting is on Google's own infrastructure, ensuring high availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. No CMS is detected as the site is custom-built by Google. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature, scalable, and secure platform suitable for enterprise-grade cloud services. Opportunities for modernization are minimal given Google's continuous updates, but ongoing performance tuning and accessibility improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100 −1Low21 findingsView report
  2. 83/100 +5Low20 findingsView report
  3. 78/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with appspot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review appspot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.