Skip to main content

Security report for apopsinet.gr

ΑΠΟΨΗ Α.Ε. · Technology · Greece

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ΑΠΟΨΗ Α.Ε. is a well-established Greek technology company with over 25 years of experience providing integrated IT solutions, including smart city IoT platforms, e-learning services, e-mentoring, and web application development. The company targets both private and public sectors, focusing on innovative digital transformation and education solutions. Their market position is solid within Greece, supported by a medium-sized business infrastructure and a clear digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, showing good digital maturity and mobile optimization. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be enhanced. Overall, the company demonstrates strong compliance with GDPR and privacy regulations, with transparent contact information and certifications that boost trust. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected, making the site reliable and professional.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apopsinet.gr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and education sectors, offering a diversified portfolio of IT services including consulting, smart city solutions, and digital education platforms. Their business model revolves around service provision and software development, targeting government entities, local authorities, and educational institutions. The presence of partner domains and subsidiaries indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The company leverages certifications and awards to enhance credibility. Their digital marketing and analytics tools suggest a moderate level of user tracking balanced with privacy compliance. Growth indicators include a long operational history and a broad service offering. Strategic partnerships with consulting and smart city solution providers strengthen their market position.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. While explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options were not detected in the HTML, the use of WordPress security plugins is implied. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the source. The absence of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy is a minor gap. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in header implementation and incident response transparency. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and enhancing security headers to further harden the site.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing a dedicated security or incident response page with contact channels.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ΑΠΟΨΗ Α.Ε.
Registration number
044596607000
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ΑΠΟΨΗ Α.Ε.
Description
Η εταιρεία παρέχει υπηρεσίες και καινοτόμες λύσεις πληροφορικής, με έμφαση στη μελέτη, σχεδίαση και υλοποίηση ολοκληρωμένων λύσεων για τον Ιδιωτικό και Δημόσιο Τομέα, ανάπτυξη διαδικτυακών εφαρμογών και λύσεων ηλεκτρονικής εκπαίδευσης.
Key services
Smart City Solutions (IoT), E-learning Platforms, E-mentoring Services, Web Applications Development, Consulting, Education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Yoast SEO Premium, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations
  3. Clear business focus on IT solutions and e-learning
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  5. Contact information is transparent and complete
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  7. Good branding and professional presentation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 using popular plugins like Yoast SEO Premium, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses a cookie consent plugin compliant with GDPR. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site design is professional and consistent, with clear navigation and relevant content. Technical risks are low but could be further reduced by improving security headers and incident response mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apopsinet.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apopsinet.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.