Skip to main content

Security report for apopsi.gr

ΑΠΟΨΗ · Technology · Greece

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ΑΠΟΨΗ is a well-established business group specializing in Information Technology, Consulting, and Education services, with over 25 years of market presence in Greece and neighboring countries. The company offers a broad range of professional services including IT solutions, consulting projects, and both subsidized and self-funded educational programs. Their market position is strong, supported by multiple subsidiary domains and certifications that enhance their credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Salient theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries and accessibility tools such as UserWay. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and performance. Analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and CookieYes are properly integrated with user consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent with granular user controls. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, the overall posture is good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with strong compliance to privacy regulations and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response disclosures could further enhance their security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apopsi.gr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Technology and Education sectors, targeting professionals, businesses, and learners. Their business model revolves around providing IT products and services, consulting, and professional training, including government-subsidized programs. The group has a diversified portfolio with multiple subsidiary domains, indicating a broad service offering and geographic reach. Their certifications and awards signal a commitment to quality and industry recognition. The presence of detailed privacy and cookie policies reflects a mature compliance posture, which is critical in their sector. The company’s digital ecosystem supports growth and customer engagement through social media and multiple service portals.

Security posture

The security maturity level is good, with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. Incident response information is not publicly disclosed, which could be a gap in readiness. The use of third-party scripts and analytics is managed with user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security culture appears positive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response communication.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing more visible certifications and security assurances on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
ΑΠΟΨΗ Α.Ε.
Registration number
044596607000
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ΑΠΟΨΗ
Description
Όμιλος επιχειρήσεων που δραστηριοποιείται στον χώρο των νέων Τεχνολογιών Πληροφορικής και Επικοινωνιών, Εκπαίδευσης και Συμβουλευτικής, με παρουσία σε Ελλάδα, Κύπρο, Βουλγαρία και Ρουμανία.
Key services
Πληροφορική, Συμβουλευτική, Εκπαίδευση
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, CookieYes Consent, UserWay Accessibility Widget, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
Salient WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adwords
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied)
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.
  3. Multiple business service domains linked and integrated.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and accessibility tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Clear contact information and business credentials provided.
  7. Cookie consent mechanism is detailed and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages WordPress CMS with the Salient theme, utilizing jQuery and other modern JavaScript libraries for UI and UX enhancements. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for data collection and marketing insights, alongside CookieYes for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Accessibility is enhanced via the UserWay widget. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading and responsive design implemented. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some security headers are missing. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. The site structure and metadata are well-formed, supporting SEO and social media sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apopsi.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apopsi.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.