Skip to main content

Security report for aol.com

AOL · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is a consent management page for AOL, which is part of the Yahoo family of brands. It provides users with options to accept, reject, or manage privacy settings related to cookies and personal data usage. The page is well-branded, consistent with AOL and Yahoo corporate identity, and links to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies hosted on legal.yahoo.com. The business operates within the technology and media sectors, focusing on digital content and advertising services. The website targets general internet users and employs standard consent frameworks aligned with GDPR requirements. From a technical perspective, the site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no detailed security or incident response policies are linked, indicating room for improvement in security posture transparency. The site uses CSRF tokens in forms, indicating some security best practices. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Yahoo Rapid and IAB Transparency & Consent Framework partners, with extensive user tracking but with clear consent mechanisms. Security-wise, the site is served over HTTPS (implied by domain and scripts), but explicit security headers are not visible in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data for the subdomain consent.yahoo.com is not separately registered, which is expected for a subdomain of a major brand. The domain is legitimate and consistent with the business identity. Overall, the website is professional, compliant with privacy regulations, and trustworthy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility and SEO features to strengthen the site's security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aol.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AOL operates as a subsidiary brand under Yahoo, providing digital content, email, and advertising services. The business model relies heavily on advertising revenue and user data analytics, supported by a large partner ecosystem including 236 IAB TCF partners. The target audience is broad, encompassing general internet users seeking news, email, and digital content. The company benefits from strong brand recognition and integration within Yahoo's portfolio, positioning it well in the technology and media sectors. Growth indicators include compliance with GDPR and adoption of industry-standard consent frameworks. The partnership with legal.yahoo.com for privacy policies reflects a centralized compliance approach. The lack of direct contact information on this page suggests that this is a functional consent layer rather than a primary business site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture score. No incident response or security policy pages are linked, limiting transparency. The site complies with GDPR through explicit consent mechanisms and links to comprehensive privacy policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security culture appears focused on compliance and user consent but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and clearer security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response documentation accessible to users and stakeholders.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all audiences.
  4. Improve SEO and metadata completeness including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for better search engine visibility.
  5. Maintain transparency by providing clear contact information and data protection officer details where applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AOL
Description
AOL is a brand under the Yahoo family offering web services including news, email, and digital content.
Key services
websites and apps, email services, digital content, advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token in form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yahoo Rapid
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
IAB Transparency & Consent Framework partners
Tracking pixels
Yahoo tracking beacon
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a consent management page for AOL under Yahoo brand
  2. Includes clear privacy and cookie policy links
  3. Uses standard consent framework with accept/reject/manage options
  4. No direct contact information or security policy pages found
  5. No WHOIS data for subdomain as expected
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenge
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with external scripts loaded from Yahoo's content delivery networks. The presence of a CSRF token in the consent form indicates attention to secure form handling. The site uses a modular CSS approach with custom properties for theming and responsive design, supporting good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some large CSS and JS files loaded. No CMS or third-party frameworks are explicitly detected. Hosting appears to be managed by Yahoo/AOL infrastructure. Opportunities exist to modernize by adopting security headers, improving SEO metadata, and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aol.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aol.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.