Skip to main content

Security report for anyclip.com

AnyClip Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AnyClip Inc. is a technology company specializing in AI-powered video solutions that transform traditional video content into dynamic, intelligent assets for businesses. Their platform focuses on video automation, monetization, and contextual advertising, targeting enterprises seeking to enhance audience engagement through innovative AI technologies. The company has a mature domain dating back to 2002, indicating an established presence in the market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tools such as WPBakery Page Builder, VideoJS for video playback, and integrates marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight. The site is hosted likely on AWS infrastructure, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, demonstrating attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status protections. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers or vulnerability disclosure information were found. Contact information is primarily via embedded forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers visible. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional transparency and security best practices. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to enable DNSSEC, publish privacy and security policies, and implement security headers to enhance trust and compliance. The website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the AI video technology market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anyclip.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AnyClip operates in the AI video technology sector, offering a SaaS platform that automates video content management and monetization. Their business model is B2B, targeting companies that want to leverage AI to improve video engagement and advertising effectiveness. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding. Their marketing ecosystem includes partnerships with HubSpot and LinkedIn for lead generation and analytics. Growth indicators include active use of advanced marketing tools and a focus on AI innovation. The lack of direct contact details suggests a lead capture strategy via forms, typical for enterprise sales. No subsidiaries or parent companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by the cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy policy documentation. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, representing areas for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file.
  5. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AnyClip Inc.
Description
AnyClip offers an AI-powered video platform that transforms traditional videos into dynamic, intelligent assets to enhance business engagement and results.
Key services
AI video platform, video automation, video monetization, contextual advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, VideoJS, HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS (DNS via awsdns), HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Google Optimize, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Salesloft, Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on AI video solutions.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are used, including HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via embedded forms.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Domain is mature and registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder, integrating VideoJS for video playback and HubSpot for marketing automation and forms. DNS is managed via AWS nameservers, indicating cloud hosting infrastructure. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata implemented. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. The technical stack is modern and supports the business model effectively, though some technical security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anyclip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anyclip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.