Skip to main content

Security report for any.law

深圳未来科创信息科技有限公司 · Technology · China

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Any.law is a Chinese SaaS provider specializing in comprehensive law firm management software. Their platform integrates client management, case tracking, team collaboration, financial management, and reporting to streamline legal practice operations. The website targets legal professionals and law firms in China, offering digital transformation tools to improve efficiency and service quality. The company behind the site is Shenzhen Future Innovation Information Technology Co., Ltd., as indicated by the ICP license and footer information. Technically, the website uses a combination of jQuery and the layui front-end framework, with Baidu Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. However, there is a lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no visible security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement in security and compliance. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no detailed SSL or header information is available. No WHOIS data is available, suggesting privacy protection or registry data unavailability, which reduces transparency. Contact information is limited to a phone number with no public email addresses or social media links. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the content. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and WHOIS transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching any.law

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Any.law operates in the legal technology sector, providing SaaS solutions tailored for law firms in China. Their competitive advantage lies in offering an integrated platform covering all aspects of law firm management, from client intake to billing and reporting. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on digital transformation for legal professionals. The target customers are small to medium law firms seeking to modernize operations. The company shows moderate market positioning with a professional website and ICP license, indicating legitimate operation in China. The absence of WHOIS data and limited contact channels suggest a cautious approach to public transparency. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related domains or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators include a comprehensive feature set and mobile accessibility, appealing to modern legal practices.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Any.law's website is moderate. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected, which are recommended best practices. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were identified, though the use of an older jQuery version (1.8.3) could pose risks if not properly managed. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR or similar regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, reducing readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices are unclear, and no data protection officer contact is provided. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Increase WHOIS transparency or provide clear registrant information to build trust with users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
深圳未来科创信息科技有限公司
Description
anylaw律所管理系统集合了客户管理、案件管理、团队协作、财务管理、审批管理和报表统计管理于一体，涵盖律所管理的方方面面，实现信息互通、协同合作，从而提高工作效率和服务质量。
Key services
客户管理, 案件管理, 团队协作, 财务管理, 审批管理, 报表统计, 文档管理, 合同管理, 时间和费用跟踪, 客户门户
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, layui CSS/JS framework, Baidu Analytics
Frameworks
layui
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
Baidu Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content describing legal practice management software.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registry data unavailability.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact phone number is prominently displayed and consistent across site.
  5. No email addresses or social media links found in the content.
  6. Uses Baidu Analytics for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture could be improved.
  8. Website content is in Chinese, targeting Chinese legal market.
  9. No forms detected in the main HTML content except login/register links to sub-application.
  10. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the layui front-end framework and jQuery 1.8.3, indicating a moderately modern but somewhat dated technology stack. Baidu Analytics is used for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile-optimized and has a professional layout with clear navigation. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced backend technologies from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement to meet standards. SEO is basic with meta descriptions and keywords present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be modernized and hardened for better security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with any.law. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review any.law.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.